From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: Tux3 report: A Golden Copy Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:19:26 -0800 Message-ID: <200901021719.26680.phillips@phunq.net> References: <200812301935.49303.phillips@phunq.net> <200901021445.37062.phillips@phunq.net> <495E9F22.3080206@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tux3@tux3.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: "Justin P. Mattock" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <495E9F22.3080206@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: tux3-bounces@tux3.org Errors-To: tux3-bounces@tux3.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Friday 02 January 2009 15:11, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > The game that came to mind when I first > heard of tux3(I had to google a bit to find the name) > was tux racer. :^) > quick question: > what is the state for security file labeling for > SELinux on this filesystem? There is a lot of interest in security labels. You are not the first to ask. Tux3 variable inode attributes are ideal for implementing security labels efficiently, way more lightweight than extended attributes. Otherwise, we would like to know exactly what people want. Regards, Daniel