From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:08:42 -0800 Message-ID: <20090109140842.16ae7c8a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090108165029.GA10951@infradead.org> <20090108175338.2abbee16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090109120254.496f75d2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, hch@infradead.org, phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:55078 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758984AbZAIWJm (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:09:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:56:54 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Of course, this assumes that someone will actually perform that testing > > > and review. Chances are that it'll just sit there, getting nothing more > > > than compilation testing. > > > > Almost every distribution ships the updated version and has done for ages > > - exactly what kind of testing is going to beat that ? > > Yes, if this is really in use by everybody, then not merging it is kind of > pointless. > Merge it! We've long needed a filesystem named after a vegetable.