From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:25:27 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20090109202010.2909.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20090108165029.GA10951@infradead.org> <20090108175338.2abbee16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Christoph Hellwig , Phillip Lougher , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:60810 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752101AbZAILZd (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 06:25:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090108175338.2abbee16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I discussed this with Phillip a bit, and it looks like we'll go for a > 2.6.21 merge. This gives a couple of months for testing and review in > linux-next. > > Of course, this assumes that someone will actually perform that testing > and review. Chances are that it'll just sit there, getting nothing more > than compilation testing. As far as I heared from japanese embedded developer, squashfs is already used by embedded community and some consumer electronics product. Therefore, I think it can merge now if it's no impact to other subsystem. > Apparently I reviewed the code a while back - that grey cell must have > died. Does anyone else intend to review the code in that timeframe? > If not, we might as well merge it now, if ever..