From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:39:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20090111153920.GC7401@elte.hu> References: <20090109023629.GA29520@linuxace.com> <20090109165422.GF24884@logfs.org> <20090109193738.GA9827@linode.davidb.org> <20090109211937.GA14342@logfs.org> <20090110124335.GB30744@elte.hu> <20090110165033.GA23943@logfs.org> <20090110101235.7ca24c44.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090110221528.GA31774@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel , David Brown , Phil Oester , Kay Sievers , Phillip Lougher , Christoph Hellwig , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Greg KH Return-path: Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:40562 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750825AbZAKPj7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:39:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > At least IMHO. > > > > ( What could _perhaps_ change the picture a bit IMO is drivers/staging/ i > > think - we could take a far more active role in certain types of > > projects that have been done out of tree typically, with no formal > > promise for compatibility - or something like that. ) > > So if staging would have existed +one year ago, we should probably have > included squashfs 3.3 at that time, and just have moved it to fs/ once > the V4 layout was finished? might have been a possibility - although there's a notable absence of any filesystem drivers in the latest drivers/staging/ set. Greg, is that just accidental (no one has submitted one yet) or is it some sort of policy? Ingo