From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] compiling on 2.6.28 broken? Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:37:00 -0800 Message-ID: <20090113113700.776a94b5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20090112190420.51f75853@pedra.chehab.org> <20090112132130.6c932b85.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090112220624.4fbfee34@pedra.chehab.org> <20090112162337.318dd61d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090113184755.87720@gmx.net> <20090113105947.9e774b69.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090113191757.74290@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, HWerner4@gmx.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@infradead.org To: handygewinnspiel@gmx.de Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:42160 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752788AbZAMTha (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:37:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090113191757.74290@gmx.net> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:17:57 +0100 handygewinnspiel@gmx.de wrote: > > > > It's the first such report I've seen. > > > > Could you please generate the strace output for the failing command so > > we can see which syscall is failing? > > Attached two strace logs, one for the failed version, one for the working version. > I'd have expected to see stat() returning -EOVERFLOW, but it isn't there. googling around a bit seems to indcate that this might be a glibc issue: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1864 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146951 But the traces are all using stat64() and fstat64(). And why would it just start occurring now?