From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] compiling on 2.6.28 broken?
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:06:57 -0500
Message-ID: <20090118220657.GA14814@infradead.org>
References: <20090113105947.9e774b69.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090113191757.74290@gmx.net> <20090113113700.776a94b5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090113203843.GJ29283@parisc-linux.org> <1231957750.8269.28.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <496E56EB.2030301@gmx.de> <1231968240.8269.48.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <496E5AB2.7040507@sandeen.net> <20090114134417.e6b29b52.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <496E5DB8.1030007@sandeen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, chris.mason@oracle.com,
	handygewinnspiel@gmx.de, matthew@wil.cx, rjw@sisk.pl,
	HWerner4@gmx.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	mchehab@infradead.org, stable@kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>,
	xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:33462 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752084AbZARWHj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:07:39 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <496E5DB8.1030007@sandeen.net>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 03:48:40PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > This patch applies OK to 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.  Is it also needed there? 
> > If so, it should have had "Cc: <stable@kernel.org>" in the changelog so
> > that it doesn't get lost.
> > 
> 
> It is needed for .28, but should not be needed for .27 AFAIK.

That's correct.