linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, mingo@elte.hu, geert@linux-m68k.org,
	joern@logfs.org, lkml@davidb.org, kernel@linuxace.com,
	kay.sievers@vrfy.org, phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk,
	hch@infradead.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:16:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090122161659.53de9e56.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090122215041.GA29369@redhat.com>

> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:50:41 -0500 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> I don't mean to piss on your parade, but from my viewpoint, staging
> is a trainwreck so far, and I'd hate to see it get worse.

I must say that I have intense "wtf were we thinking of" moments each time
something in staging/ sticks an ugly head out of its cave.

My question is: what is the process for moving things out of staging/ and
into the kernel proper?  We don't want to be merging ex-crap code which has
had its whitespace and wrappers cleaned up by a person who is not suitably
experienced in the relevant subsystem.

It _should_ (I think) be "OK, this is ready for us to start reviewing". 
ie: treat it as if it had just come in from a random new submitter.

a) If that happens, who will be responding to the review comments?  Who
   was the submitter?

b) What happens if it is then decided that we just don't want that code
   in the tree at all?

c) Has any code yet made the transition out of staging and into the
   kernel proper?  If so, which?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-23  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-08 16:48 [GIT PULL] Squashfs pull request for 2.6.29 Phillip Lougher
2009-01-08 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-01-08 17:05   ` Phillip Lougher
2009-01-08 17:11   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-01-08 23:55   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-09  1:53   ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-09  2:11     ` Phillip Lougher
2009-01-09  2:24       ` Kay Sievers
2009-01-09  2:36         ` Phil Oester
2009-01-09 16:54           ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-09 19:37             ` David Brown
2009-01-09 21:19               ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-10 12:43                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-10 16:50                   ` Jörn Engel
2009-01-10 18:12                     ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-10 18:30                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-10 19:57                         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-01-10 20:16                           ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-01-11  6:36                         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-01-10 19:19                       ` Olivier Galibert
2009-01-10 22:15                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11  9:30                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-01-11 15:39                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-11 16:30                             ` Greg KH
2009-01-22 21:50                               ` Dave Jones
2009-01-22 21:57                                 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-22 22:15                                   ` Greg KH
2009-01-22 21:58                                 ` Greg KH
2009-01-22 22:26                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-22 22:50                                   ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-22 23:04                                     ` Greg KH
2009-01-22 23:25                                       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-22 23:34                                       ` Kyle McMartin
2009-01-22 23:41                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-22 23:28                                     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-01-22 22:16                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-22 22:24                                   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23  0:16                                 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-01-23  0:30                                   ` Greg KH
2009-01-09  2:30     ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-09 11:25     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-09 12:02     ` Alan Cox
2009-01-09 21:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-09 22:08         ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-09 22:12           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-01-09 22:26             ` Alan Cox
2009-01-09 22:36               ` Harvey Harrison
2009-01-11  3:01         ` Phillip Lougher
2009-01-11  3:06           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-01-09 16:32     ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090122161659.53de9e56.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=joern@logfs.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=kernel@linuxace.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@davidb.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).