From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: lkml@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
nfsv4@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: only set file_lock.fl_lmops in nfsd4_lockt if a stateowner is found
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:52:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090122185232.GC15279@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232555691-29859-3-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 11:34:51AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> nfsd4_lockt does a search for a lockstateowner when building the lock
> struct to test. If one is found, it'll set fl_owner to it. Regardless of
> whether that happens, it'll also set fl_lmops.
>
> If a lockstateowner is not found, then we'll have fl_owner set to NULL
> and fl_lmops set pointing to nfsd_posix_mng_ops. Other parts of the
> NFSv4 server code assume that fl_owner will point to a valid
> nfs4_stateowner if fl_lmops is set this way.
>
> This behavior exposed a bug in DLM's GETLK implementation where it
> wasn't clearing out the fields in the file_lock before filling in
> conflicting lock info. While we were able to fix this in DLM, it
> still seems pointless and dangerous to set the fl_lmops this way
> when we have a NULL lockstateowner.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 88db7d3..07d196a 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -2867,11 +2867,13 @@ nfsd4_lockt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
>
> lockt->lt_stateowner = find_lockstateowner_str(inode,
> &lockt->lt_clientid, &lockt->lt_owner);
> - if (lockt->lt_stateowner)
> + if (lockt->lt_stateowner) {
> file_lock.fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)lockt->lt_stateowner;
> + file_lock.fl_lmops = &nfsd_posix_mng_ops;
So I think we just shouldn't need this second assignment at all.
--b.
> + }
> +
> file_lock.fl_pid = current->tgid;
> file_lock.fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
> - file_lock.fl_lmops = &nfsd_posix_mng_ops;
>
> file_lock.fl_start = lockt->lt_offset;
> file_lock.fl_end = last_byte_offset(lockt->lt_offset, lockt->lt_length);
> --
> 1.5.5.6
>
> _______________________________________________
> NFSv4 mailing list
> NFSv4@linux-nfs.org
> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-22 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 16:34 [PATCH 0/2] nfsd/dlm: fix knfsd panic when NFSv4 client does GETLK call on GFS2 (regression) Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <1232555691-29859-1-git-send-email-jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] dlm: initialize file_lock struct in GETLK before copying conflicting lock Jeff Layton
2009-01-21 23:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 2:26 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 18:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 18:37 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 18:05 ` [Cluster-devel] " David Teigland
2009-01-22 18:37 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20090122133733.5d692a09-xSBYVWDuneFaJnirhKH9O4GKTjYczspe@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-22 19:03 ` David Teigland
2009-01-22 18:48 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-21 16:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: only set file_lock.fl_lmops in nfsd4_lockt if a stateowner is found Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 18:52 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-01-22 18:58 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20090122135838.7aa9d9f3-xSBYVWDuneFaJnirhKH9O4GKTjYczspe@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-22 19:12 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-22 18:59 ` Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:09 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20090122140902.0cedf21b-xSBYVWDuneFaJnirhKH9O4GKTjYczspe@public.gmane.org>
2009-01-22 19:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-22 19:16 [PATCH 0/2] nfsd/dlm: fix knfsd panic when NFSv4 client does GETLK call Jeff Layton
2009-01-22 19:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: only set file_lock.fl_lmops in nfsd4_lockt if a stateowner is found Jeff Layton
2009-01-27 22:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090122185232.GC15279@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).