From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Jos Houtman <jos-vMeIAzyucXQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin-/E1597aS9LT0CCvOHzKKcA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org"
<jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org"
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
"hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org"
<hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Page Cache writeback too slow, SSD/noop scheduler/ext2
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:28:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090331002838.GA5895@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C5F6B627.D9D0%jos-vMeIAzyucXQ@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:47:19AM +0800, Jos Houtman wrote:
>
> >> Thanx for the patch, but for the next time: How should I apply it?
> >> it seems to be context aware (@@) and broke on all kernel versions I tried
> >> 2.6.28/2.6.28.7/2.6.29
> >
> > Do you mean that the patch applies after removing " @@.*$"?
>
> I didn't try that, but this time it worked. So it was probably my error.
>
> >
> > You are right. In your case, there are several big dirty files in sdb1,
> > and the sdb write queue is constantly (almost-)congested. The SSD write
> > speed is so slow, that in each round of sdb1 writeback, it begins with
> > an uncongested queue, but quickly fills up after writing some pages.
> > Hence all the inodes will get redirtied because of (nr_to_write > 0).
> >
> > The following quick fix should solve the slow-writeback-on-congested-SSD
> > problem. However the writeback sequence is suboptimal: it sync-and-requeue
> > each file until congested (in your case about 3~600 pages) instead of
> > until MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES=1024 pages.
>
> Yeah that fixed it, but performance dropped due to the more constant
> congestion. So I will need to try some different io schedulers.
Read performance or write performance?
> Next to that I was wondering if there are any plans to make sure that not
> all dirty-files are written back in the same interval.
>
> In my case all database files are written back each 30 seconds, while I
> would prefer them to be more divided over the interval.
pdflush will wake up every 5s to sync files dirtied more than 30s.
So the writeback of inodes should be distributed(somehow randomly)
into these 5s-interval-wakeups due to varied dirty times.
However the distribution may well be uneven in may cases. It seems to
be conflicting goals for HDD and SSD: one favors somehow small busty
writeback, another favors smooth writeback streams. I guess the better
scheme would be bursty pdflush writebacks plus IO scheduler level QoS.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-31 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <C5EC2B99.C3B3%jos@hyves.nl>
[not found] ` <200903250148.53644.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
[not found] ` <200903250148.53644.nickpiggin-/E1597aS9LT0CCvOHzKKcA@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-25 5:26 ` Page Cache writeback too slow, SSD/noop scheduler/ext2 Wu Fengguang
2009-03-27 16:59 ` Jos Houtman
[not found] ` <C5F2C492.D4A8%jos-vMeIAzyucXQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-29 2:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-30 16:47 ` Jos Houtman
[not found] ` <C5F6B627.D9D0%jos-vMeIAzyucXQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-31 0:28 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-03-31 12:16 ` Jos Houtman
[not found] ` <C5F7D654.DE6F%jos-vMeIAzyucXQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-31 12:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-31 14:10 ` Jos Houtman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090331002838.GA5895@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jos-vMeIAzyucXQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nickpiggin-/E1597aS9LT0CCvOHzKKcA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).