From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-cifs-client] [PATCH 1/3] cifs: rename cifs_iget to
	cifs_root_iget
Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:42:14 -0400
Message-ID: <20090405134214.GA5773@infradead.org>
References: <1238936961-6979-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <1238936961-6979-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-cifs-client@lists.samba.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:38446 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752756AbZDENmQ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 5 Apr 2009 09:42:16 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1238936961-6979-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:09:19AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The current cifs_iget isn't suitable for anything but the root inode.
> Rename it with a more appropriate name.

And using it for the root inode is stupid, too as it can't be in cache.

The root inode is the case where you can easily use new_inode.