linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] vfs: 'stat light' fstatat flags
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:13:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090407181313.GG31824@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090407174821.GU3204@webber.adilger.int>

Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > Instead, as was proposed in the last generation of this thread,
> > > there should be
> > > AT_GET_{ATIME,MTIME,CTIME,BLOCKS,SIZE,NLINKS,...}, to return the
> > > flags that the application actually wants.
> > 
> > Well, I respectfully disagree. In my opinion, this adds unncessary
> > complexity to an already targetted case, where only a handful of
> > file systems will even care to optimize away a couple of
> > fields. In that light, I really think we want simplicity here.
> 
> The difficult part is that the application knows which fields it is going
> to use, and the filesystem knows which fields are expensive to fill in,
> and by merging multiple fields together you are deciding arbitrarily that
> you know better than either.  The main users will be common tools like
> "ls --color" and "find", and they know exactly which fields are needed,
> but they need to do a LOT of stats so making it efficient is worthwhile.

I agree with Andreas.  The issue isn't "what is efficient and simple (now)",
but what makes a good future-compatible interface.

> > The good news is that we still have a
> > very good amount of space in the flags field. We could always go back if we
> > _really_ find the need to micro-optimize to the point of per stat field
> > flags. Again though, at this point I don't really think starting out with a
> > slew of flags is a good idea.
> 
> Similar to the helper macros for S_IRWXU = (S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|S_IXUSR)
> applications won't necessarily need to specify all flags explicitly.

Yes.

If it's intended to re-use the fstatat system call for this, the
conversion from "no stat field flags" to AT_STAT_ALL should be done in
the general fstatat code.

fstatat() is for doing stat() or lstat() relative to an open
directory.  (Anyone else thing the name is stupid - why isn't it
statat like openat, etc.?)

So how do you do a selective fstat() - attributes of an open file?
Don't waste a flag, and just specify AT_SELF as the pathname value to
mean return the attributes of the fd argument itself.  AT_SELF would
be NULL, or perhaps (const char *) -1 to catch application errors.

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-07 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-07  8:00 [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] vfs: 'stat light' fstatat flags Mark Fasheh
2009-04-07 10:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-04-07 14:59   ` Oleg Drokin
2009-04-07 15:18   ` Sage Weil
2009-04-07 15:29   ` Mark Fasheh
2009-04-07 17:52     ` Andreas Dilger
2009-04-07 18:13       ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2009-04-07 23:13   ` Russell Cattelan
2009-04-07 17:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-07 17:48   ` Oleg Drokin
2009-04-07 18:16     ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-07 18:24       ` Oleg Drokin
2009-04-07 20:37         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-08 18:48           ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-09 15:13             ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090407181313.GG31824@shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=sage@newdream.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).