From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] vfs: 'stat light' fstatat flags
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:13:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090407181313.GG31824@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090407174821.GU3204@webber.adilger.int>
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > > Instead, as was proposed in the last generation of this thread,
> > > there should be
> > > AT_GET_{ATIME,MTIME,CTIME,BLOCKS,SIZE,NLINKS,...}, to return the
> > > flags that the application actually wants.
> >
> > Well, I respectfully disagree. In my opinion, this adds unncessary
> > complexity to an already targetted case, where only a handful of
> > file systems will even care to optimize away a couple of
> > fields. In that light, I really think we want simplicity here.
>
> The difficult part is that the application knows which fields it is going
> to use, and the filesystem knows which fields are expensive to fill in,
> and by merging multiple fields together you are deciding arbitrarily that
> you know better than either. The main users will be common tools like
> "ls --color" and "find", and they know exactly which fields are needed,
> but they need to do a LOT of stats so making it efficient is worthwhile.
I agree with Andreas. The issue isn't "what is efficient and simple (now)",
but what makes a good future-compatible interface.
> > The good news is that we still have a
> > very good amount of space in the flags field. We could always go back if we
> > _really_ find the need to micro-optimize to the point of per stat field
> > flags. Again though, at this point I don't really think starting out with a
> > slew of flags is a good idea.
>
> Similar to the helper macros for S_IRWXU = (S_IRUSR|S_IWUSR|S_IXUSR)
> applications won't necessarily need to specify all flags explicitly.
Yes.
If it's intended to re-use the fstatat system call for this, the
conversion from "no stat field flags" to AT_STAT_ALL should be done in
the general fstatat code.
fstatat() is for doing stat() or lstat() relative to an open
directory. (Anyone else thing the name is stupid - why isn't it
statat like openat, etc.?)
So how do you do a selective fstat() - attributes of an open file?
Don't waste a flag, and just specify AT_SELF as the pathname value to
mean return the attributes of the fd argument itself. AT_SELF would
be NULL, or perhaps (const char *) -1 to catch application errors.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-07 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-07 8:00 [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] vfs: 'stat light' fstatat flags Mark Fasheh
2009-04-07 10:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-04-07 14:59 ` Oleg Drokin
2009-04-07 15:18 ` Sage Weil
2009-04-07 15:29 ` Mark Fasheh
2009-04-07 17:52 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-04-07 18:13 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2009-04-07 23:13 ` Russell Cattelan
2009-04-07 17:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-07 17:48 ` Oleg Drokin
2009-04-07 18:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-07 18:24 ` Oleg Drokin
2009-04-07 20:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-08 18:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-09 15:13 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090407181313.GG31824@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).