From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: [LTP] statvfs -> f_bavail Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:38:47 -0600 Message-ID: <20090421003847.GO3209@webber.adilger.int> References: <49E759FB.70103@petalogix.com> <49E847FB.1030801@petalogix.com> <20090417173107.GA3590@refried.org> <49EC1352.6010900@petalogix.com> <20090420062642.GY26366@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <49EC1945.1000805@petalogix.com> <20090421002503.GA8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Michal Simek , Nate Straz , subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, John Williams , Linux Kernel list , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Return-path: Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: <20090421002503.GA8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Apr 21, 2009 01:25 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > a) ramfs has no such thing as "amount of available space", simply > because it has no limit on total size occupied. Well, except the amount of RAM in the system, which would be a reasonable value to use. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.