From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
hch@infradead.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix i_mutex handling in nfsd readdir
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:12:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090422191244.GD9541@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7321.1240375306@jrobl>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:41:46PM +0900, hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
>
> David Woodhouse:
> > This patch fixes it by locking the directory's i_mutex again before
> > calling the filldir functions. The original deadlocks which commit
> :::
>
> An entry may be removed between the first mutex_unlock and the second
> mutex_lock. In this case, lookup_one_len() in compose_entry_fh() will
> return a negative dentry.
> Currently the inode test (positive/negative) is done AFTER fh_compose().
> Isn't it better to test it BEFORE fh_compose()?
>
> compose_entry_fh()
> {
> :::
> dchild = lookup_one_len(name, dparent, namlen);
> if (IS_ERR(dchild))
> return 1;
> if (d_mountpoint(dchild) ||
> fh_compose(fhp, exp, dchild, &cd->fh) != 0 ||
> !dchild->d_inode)
> rv = 1;
> :::
> }
Yes, I think you're right.
Arrrgh.
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-22 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 14:54 Q: NFSD readdir in linux-2.6.28 hooanon05
2009-03-19 15:17 ` David Woodhouse
2009-03-19 15:34 ` hooanon05
2009-03-19 15:51 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-17 9:32 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-17 19:32 ` Al Viro
2009-04-17 22:17 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-17 22:43 ` Al Viro
2009-04-17 22:51 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-17 22:53 ` Al Viro
2009-04-17 22:55 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-17 23:23 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-17 23:37 ` Al Viro
2009-04-17 23:39 ` Al Viro
2009-04-18 0:15 ` [PATCH] Fix i_mutex handling in nfsd readdir David Woodhouse
2009-04-18 3:11 ` hooanon05
2009-04-18 14:25 ` Al Viro
2009-04-19 7:18 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-19 12:27 ` [PATCH v2] " David Woodhouse
2009-04-19 20:51 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-20 19:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-21 0:29 ` Al Viro
2009-04-21 21:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-21 21:54 ` Al Viro
2009-05-11 23:16 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-22 4:41 ` hooanon05
2009-04-22 19:12 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2009-04-23 6:40 ` hooanon05
2009-04-23 20:27 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-05 23:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-06 5:09 ` hooanon05
2009-05-06 20:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-07 4:38 ` hooanon05
2009-05-08 18:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-03-19 15:37 ` Q: NFSD readdir in linux-2.6.28 Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-19 15:45 ` hooanon05
2009-03-19 16:01 ` David Woodhouse
2009-04-16 21:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-04-17 4:13 ` hooanon05
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090422191244.GD9541@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).