linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: Merge sync_supers(), sync_filesystems() and sync_blockdevs()
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:06:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090423110657.GA4833@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240415781-17834-3-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 05:56:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> These three functions are quite similar so merge them to save superblock list
> traversal code. As a bonus we get livelock avoidance for all these superblock
> traversals. Also remove the condition that if wait == 0 and sb->s_dirt is
> not set, then ->sync_fs() is not called. This does not really make much sence
> since s_dirt is generally used by filesystem to mean that ->write_super() needs
> to be called. But ->sync_fs() does different things. I even suspect that some
> filesystems (btrfs?) sets s_dirt just to fool this logic.

Please separate the s_dirt bit out into a small patch, that's something
we probably want for -stable, too.

Otherwise the patch looks reasonable.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-22 15:56 [PATCH 0/2] Fix sys_sync() bug and slightly cleanup the code Jan Kara
2009-04-22 15:56 ` [PATCH] vfs: Fix sys_sync() and fsync_super() reliability Jan Kara
2009-04-22 17:16   ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-22 17:23     ` Jan Kara
2009-04-23 11:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-23 13:07     ` Jan Kara
2009-04-23 13:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-22 15:56 ` [PATCH] vfs: Merge sync_supers(), sync_filesystems() and sync_blockdevs() Jan Kara
2009-04-22 17:20   ` Trond Myklebust
2009-04-23 11:06   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-04-23 12:31   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090423110657.GA4833@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).