From: Valerie Aurora Henson <vaurora@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fpathconf() for fsync() behavior
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:49:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090423154959.GE8476@shell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090423111147.GC4833@infradead.org>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:11:47AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:12:57PM -0400, Valerie Aurora Henson wrote:
> > In the default mode for ext3 and btrfs, fsync() is both slow and
> > unnecessary for some important application use cases - at the same
> > time that it is absolutely required for correctness for other modes of
> > ext3, ext4, XFS, etc. If applications could easilyl distinguish
> > between the two cases, they would be more likely to be correct and
> > fast.
> >
> > How about an fpathconf() variable, something like _PC_ORDERED? E.g.:
>
> Before we add any new fpathconf varibale we need a reall (f)pathconf(at)
> syscall so that the fs driver can exposed it's characteristics, having
> to replicate that information to glibc especially for something required
> for data integrity is a receipe for a desaster.
I think a real pathconf() is a great idea, regardless of the solution
for this exact problem. Anyone want to beat me to the patch? I
really need to be working on union mounts right now.
-VAL
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-23 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-23 0:12 [RFC PATCH] fpathconf() for fsync() behavior Valerie Aurora Henson
2009-04-23 5:17 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-23 11:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-23 12:42 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-23 12:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-23 14:10 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-23 16:16 ` Valerie Aurora Henson
2009-04-26 9:26 ` Pavel Machek
2009-04-23 16:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-23 17:29 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-23 20:44 ` fsync_range_with_flags() - improving sync_file_range() Jamie Lokier
2009-04-23 21:13 ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-23 22:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-23 16:04 ` [RFC PATCH] fpathconf() for fsync() behavior Valerie Aurora Henson
2009-04-23 16:10 ` Ric Wheeler
2009-04-23 17:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-04-23 11:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-23 15:49 ` Valerie Aurora Henson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090423154959.GE8476@shell \
--to=vaurora@redhat.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).