From: npiggin@suse.de
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 01/27] fs: cleanup files_lock
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:20:21 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090425012209.061706790@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090425012020.457460929@suse.de
[-- Attachment #1: fs-files_list-improve.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 11095 bytes --]
Lock tty_files with tty_mutex, provide helpers to manipulate the per-sb
files list, and unexport the files_lock spinlock.
---
drivers/char/pty.c | 6 +++-
drivers/char/tty_io.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------
fs/file_table.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
fs/open.c | 4 +-
fs/super.c | 39 ---------------------------
include/linux/fs.h | 8 ++---
security/selinux/hooks.c | 4 +-
7 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/char/pty.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/pty.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/pty.c
@@ -662,7 +662,11 @@ static int __ptmx_open(struct inode *ino
set_bit(TTY_PTY_LOCK, &tty->flags); /* LOCK THE SLAVE */
filp->private_data = tty;
- file_move(filp, &tty->tty_files);
+
+ mutex_lock(&tty_mutex);
+ file_list_del(filp);
+ list_add(&filp->f_u.fu_list, &tty->tty_files);
+ mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
retval = devpts_pty_new(inode, tty->link);
if (retval)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/char/tty_io.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/char/tty_io.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/char/tty_io.c
@@ -229,17 +229,15 @@ int tty_paranoia_check(struct tty_struct
return 0;
}
-static int check_tty_count(struct tty_struct *tty, const char *routine)
+static int __check_tty_count(struct tty_struct *tty, const char *routine)
{
#ifdef CHECK_TTY_COUNT
struct list_head *p;
int count = 0;
- file_list_lock();
list_for_each(p, &tty->tty_files) {
count++;
}
- file_list_unlock();
if (tty->driver->type == TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_PTY &&
tty->driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_SLAVE &&
tty->link && tty->link->count)
@@ -254,6 +252,19 @@ static int check_tty_count(struct tty_st
return 0;
}
+static int check_tty_count(struct tty_struct *tty, const char *routine)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+#ifdef CHECK_TTY_COUNT
+ mutex_lock(&tty_mutex);
+ ret = __check_tty_count(tty, routine);
+ mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
+#endif
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/**
* get_tty_driver - find device of a tty
* @dev_t: device identifier
@@ -543,6 +554,8 @@ static void do_tty_hangup(struct work_st
if (!tty)
return;
+ mutex_lock(&tty_mutex);
+
/* inuse_filps is protected by the single kernel lock */
lock_kernel();
@@ -553,8 +566,7 @@ static void do_tty_hangup(struct work_st
}
spin_unlock(&redirect_lock);
- check_tty_count(tty, "do_tty_hangup");
- file_list_lock();
+ __check_tty_count(tty, "do_tty_hangup");
/* This breaks for file handles being sent over AF_UNIX sockets ? */
list_for_each_entry(filp, &tty->tty_files, f_u.fu_list) {
if (filp->f_op->write == redirected_tty_write)
@@ -565,7 +577,7 @@ static void do_tty_hangup(struct work_st
tty_fasync(-1, filp, 0); /* can't block */
filp->f_op = &hung_up_tty_fops;
}
- file_list_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
/*
* FIXME! What are the locking issues here? This may me overdoing
* things... This question is especially important now that we've
@@ -1467,9 +1479,9 @@ static void release_one_tty(struct kref
tty_driver_kref_put(driver);
module_put(driver->owner);
- file_list_lock();
+ mutex_lock(&tty_mutex);
list_del_init(&tty->tty_files);
- file_list_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
free_tty_struct(tty);
}
@@ -1678,7 +1690,8 @@ void tty_release_dev(struct file *filp)
* - do_tty_hangup no longer sees this file descriptor as
* something that needs to be handled for hangups.
*/
- file_kill(filp);
+ BUG_ON(list_empty(&filp->f_u.fu_list));
+ list_del_init(&filp->f_u.fu_list);
filp->private_data = NULL;
/*
@@ -1836,8 +1849,12 @@ got_driver:
return PTR_ERR(tty);
filp->private_data = tty;
- file_move(filp, &tty->tty_files);
- check_tty_count(tty, "tty_open");
+ mutex_lock(&tty_mutex);
+ BUG_ON(list_empty(&filp->f_u.fu_list));
+ file_list_del(filp); /* __dentry_open has put it on the sb list */
+ list_add(&filp->f_u.fu_list, &tty->tty_files);
+ __check_tty_count(tty, "tty_open");
+ mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
if (tty->driver->type == TTY_DRIVER_TYPE_PTY &&
tty->driver->subtype == PTY_TYPE_MASTER)
noctty = 1;
Index: linux-2.6/fs/file_table.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/file_table.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/file_table.c
@@ -30,8 +30,7 @@ struct files_stat_struct files_stat = {
.max_files = NR_FILE
};
-/* public. Not pretty! */
-__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(files_lock);
+static __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(files_lock);
/* SLAB cache for file structures */
static struct kmem_cache *filp_cachep __read_mostly;
@@ -285,7 +284,7 @@ void __fput(struct file *file)
cdev_put(inode->i_cdev);
fops_put(file->f_op);
put_pid(file->f_owner.pid);
- file_kill(file);
+ file_list_del(file);
if (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE)
drop_file_write_access(file);
file->f_path.dentry = NULL;
@@ -347,31 +346,29 @@ struct file *fget_light(unsigned int fd,
return file;
}
-
void put_filp(struct file *file)
{
if (atomic_long_dec_and_test(&file->f_count)) {
security_file_free(file);
- file_kill(file);
+ file_list_del(file);
file_free(file);
}
}
-void file_move(struct file *file, struct list_head *list)
+void file_sb_list_add(struct file *file, struct super_block *sb)
{
- if (!list)
- return;
- file_list_lock();
- list_move(&file->f_u.fu_list, list);
- file_list_unlock();
+ spin_lock(&files_lock);
+ BUG_ON(!list_empty(&file->f_u.fu_list));
+ list_add(&file->f_u.fu_list, &sb->s_files);
+ spin_unlock(&files_lock);
}
-void file_kill(struct file *file)
+void file_list_del(struct file *file)
{
if (!list_empty(&file->f_u.fu_list)) {
- file_list_lock();
+ spin_lock(&files_lock);
list_del_init(&file->f_u.fu_list);
- file_list_unlock();
+ spin_unlock(&files_lock);
}
}
@@ -380,7 +377,7 @@ int fs_may_remount_ro(struct super_block
struct file *file;
/* Check that no files are currently opened for writing. */
- file_list_lock();
+ spin_lock(&files_lock);
list_for_each_entry(file, &sb->s_files, f_u.fu_list) {
struct inode *inode = file->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
@@ -392,13 +389,48 @@ int fs_may_remount_ro(struct super_block
if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) && (file->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
goto too_bad;
}
- file_list_unlock();
+ spin_unlock(&files_lock);
return 1; /* Tis' cool bro. */
too_bad:
- file_list_unlock();
+ spin_unlock(&files_lock);
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * mark_files_ro - mark all files read-only
+ * @sb: superblock in question
+ *
+ * All files are marked read-only. We don't care about pending
+ * delete files so this should be used in 'force' mode only.
+ */
+void mark_files_ro(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+ struct file *f;
+
+retry:
+ spin_lock(&files_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(f, &sb->s_files, f_u.fu_list) {
+ struct vfsmount *mnt;
+ if (!S_ISREG(f->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
+ continue;
+ if (!file_count(f))
+ continue;
+ if (!(f->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ continue;
+ f->f_mode &= ~FMODE_WRITE;
+ if (file_check_writeable(f) != 0)
+ continue;
+ file_release_write(f);
+ mnt = mntget(f->f_path.mnt);
+ /* This can sleep, so we can't hold the spinlock. */
+ spin_unlock(&files_lock);
+ mnt_drop_write(mnt);
+ mntput(mnt);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&files_lock);
+}
+
void __init files_init(unsigned long mempages)
{
int n;
Index: linux-2.6/fs/open.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/open.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/open.c
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ static struct file *__dentry_open(struct
f->f_path.mnt = mnt;
f->f_pos = 0;
f->f_op = fops_get(inode->i_fop);
- file_move(f, &inode->i_sb->s_files);
+ file_sb_list_add(f, inode->i_sb);
error = security_dentry_open(f, cred);
if (error)
@@ -873,7 +873,7 @@ cleanup_all:
mnt_drop_write(mnt);
}
}
- file_kill(f);
+ file_list_del(f);
f->f_path.dentry = NULL;
f->f_path.mnt = NULL;
cleanup_file:
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -934,9 +934,6 @@ struct file {
unsigned long f_mnt_write_state;
#endif
};
-extern spinlock_t files_lock;
-#define file_list_lock() spin_lock(&files_lock);
-#define file_list_unlock() spin_unlock(&files_lock);
#define get_file(x) atomic_long_inc(&(x)->f_count)
#define file_count(x) atomic_long_read(&(x)->f_count)
@@ -2021,6 +2018,7 @@ extern const struct file_operations read
extern const struct file_operations write_pipefifo_fops;
extern const struct file_operations rdwr_pipefifo_fops;
+extern void mark_files_ro(struct super_block *sb);
extern int fs_may_remount_ro(struct super_block *);
#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
@@ -2172,8 +2170,8 @@ static inline void insert_inode_hash(str
}
extern struct file * get_empty_filp(void);
-extern void file_move(struct file *f, struct list_head *list);
-extern void file_kill(struct file *f);
+extern void file_sb_list_add(struct file *f, struct super_block *sb);
+extern void file_list_del(struct file *f);
#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
struct bio;
extern void submit_bio(int, struct bio *);
Index: linux-2.6/fs/super.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/super.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/super.c
@@ -588,45 +588,6 @@ out:
}
/**
- * mark_files_ro - mark all files read-only
- * @sb: superblock in question
- *
- * All files are marked read-only. We don't care about pending
- * delete files so this should be used in 'force' mode only.
- */
-
-static void mark_files_ro(struct super_block *sb)
-{
- struct file *f;
-
-retry:
- file_list_lock();
- list_for_each_entry(f, &sb->s_files, f_u.fu_list) {
- struct vfsmount *mnt;
- if (!S_ISREG(f->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mode))
- continue;
- if (!file_count(f))
- continue;
- if (!(f->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
- continue;
- f->f_mode &= ~FMODE_WRITE;
- if (file_check_writeable(f) != 0)
- continue;
- file_release_write(f);
- mnt = mntget(f->f_path.mnt);
- file_list_unlock();
- /*
- * This can sleep, so we can't hold
- * the file_list_lock() spinlock.
- */
- mnt_drop_write(mnt);
- mntput(mnt);
- goto retry;
- }
- file_list_unlock();
-}
-
-/**
* do_remount_sb - asks filesystem to change mount options.
* @sb: superblock in question
* @flags: numeric part of options
Index: linux-2.6/security/selinux/hooks.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ linux-2.6/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -2244,7 +2244,7 @@ static inline void flush_unauthorized_fi
tty = get_current_tty();
if (tty) {
- file_list_lock();
+ mutex_lock(&tty_mutex);
if (!list_empty(&tty->tty_files)) {
struct inode *inode;
@@ -2260,7 +2260,7 @@ static inline void flush_unauthorized_fi
drop_tty = 1;
}
}
- file_list_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
tty_kref_put(tty);
}
/* Reset controlling tty. */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-25 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-25 1:20 [patch 00/27] [rfc] vfs scalability patchset npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` npiggin [this message]
2009-04-25 3:20 ` [patch 01/27] fs: cleanup files_lock Al Viro
2009-04-25 5:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-26 6:12 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 9:42 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-26 6:15 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 02/27] fs: scale files_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 3:32 ` Al Viro
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 03/27] fs: mnt_want_write speedup npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 04/27] fs: introduce mnt_clone_write npiggin
2009-04-25 3:35 ` Al Viro
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 05/27] fs: brlock vfsmount_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 3:50 ` Al Viro
2009-04-26 6:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 06/27] fs: dcache fix LRU ordering npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 07/27] fs: dcache scale hash npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 08/27] fs: dcache scale lru npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 09/27] fs: dcache scale nr_dentry npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 10/27] fs: dcache scale dentry refcount npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 11/27] fs: dcache scale d_unhashed npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 12/27] fs: dcache scale subdirs npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 13/27] fs: scale inode alias list npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 14/27] fs: use RCU / seqlock logic for reverse and multi-step operaitons npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 15/27] fs: dcache remove dcache_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 16/27] fs: dcache reduce dput locking npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 17/27] fs: dcache per-bucket dcache hash locking npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 18/27] fs: dcache reduce dcache_inode_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 19/27] fs: dcache per-inode inode alias locking npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 20/27] fs: icache lock s_inodes list npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 21/27] fs: icache lock inode hash npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 22/27] fs: icache lock i_state npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 23/27] fs: icache lock i_count npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 24/27] fs: icache atomic inodes_stat npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 25/27] fs: icache lock lru/writeback lists npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 26/27] fs: icache protect inode state npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 27/27] fs: icache remove inode_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 4:18 ` [patch 00/27] [rfc] vfs scalability patchset Al Viro
2009-04-25 5:02 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 8:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-25 8:06 ` Al Viro
2009-04-28 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-28 9:48 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-28 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-28 11:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-30 6:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 19:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-25 19:31 ` Al Viro
2009-04-25 20:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-25 22:05 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090425012209.061706790@suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).