From: npiggin@suse.de
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 18/27] fs: dcache reduce dcache_inode_lock
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:20:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090425012211.654829938@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090425012020.457460929@suse.de
[-- Attachment #1: fs-dcache-d_delete-less-lock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1893 bytes --]
dcache_inode_lock can be avoided in d_delete() and d_materialise_unique()
in cases where it is not required.
---
fs/dcache.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
@@ -1746,10 +1746,14 @@ void d_delete(struct dentry * dentry)
/*
* Are we the only user?
*/
- spin_lock(&dcache_inode_lock);
+again:
spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
isdir = S_ISDIR(dentry->d_inode->i_mode);
if (dentry->d_count == 1) {
+ if (!spin_trylock(&dcache_inode_lock)) {
+ spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+ goto again;
+ }
dentry_iput(dentry);
fsnotify_nameremove(dentry, isdir);
return;
@@ -1759,7 +1763,6 @@ void d_delete(struct dentry * dentry)
__d_drop(dentry);
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
- spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
fsnotify_nameremove(dentry, isdir);
}
@@ -2066,14 +2069,15 @@ struct dentry *d_materialise_unique(stru
BUG_ON(!d_unhashed(dentry));
- spin_lock(&dcache_inode_lock);
-
if (!inode) {
actual = dentry;
__d_instantiate(dentry, NULL);
- goto found_lock;
+ d_rehash(actual);
+ goto out_nolock;
}
+ spin_lock(&dcache_inode_lock);
+
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
struct dentry *alias;
@@ -2101,10 +2105,9 @@ struct dentry *d_materialise_unique(stru
actual = __d_instantiate_unique(dentry, inode);
if (!actual)
actual = dentry;
- else if (unlikely(!d_unhashed(actual)))
- goto shouldnt_be_hashed;
+ else
+ BUG_ON(!d_unhashed(actual));
-found_lock:
spin_lock(&actual->d_lock);
found:
_d_rehash(actual);
@@ -2118,10 +2121,6 @@ out_nolock:
iput(inode);
return actual;
-
-shouldnt_be_hashed:
- spin_unlock(&dcache_inode_lock);
- BUG();
}
static int prepend(char **buffer, int *buflen, const char *str, int namelen)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-25 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-25 1:20 [patch 00/27] [rfc] vfs scalability patchset npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 01/27] fs: cleanup files_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 3:20 ` Al Viro
2009-04-25 5:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-26 6:12 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 9:42 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-26 6:15 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 02/27] fs: scale files_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 3:32 ` Al Viro
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 03/27] fs: mnt_want_write speedup npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 04/27] fs: introduce mnt_clone_write npiggin
2009-04-25 3:35 ` Al Viro
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 05/27] fs: brlock vfsmount_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 3:50 ` Al Viro
2009-04-26 6:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 06/27] fs: dcache fix LRU ordering npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 07/27] fs: dcache scale hash npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 08/27] fs: dcache scale lru npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 09/27] fs: dcache scale nr_dentry npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 10/27] fs: dcache scale dentry refcount npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 11/27] fs: dcache scale d_unhashed npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 12/27] fs: dcache scale subdirs npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 13/27] fs: scale inode alias list npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 14/27] fs: use RCU / seqlock logic for reverse and multi-step operaitons npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 15/27] fs: dcache remove dcache_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 16/27] fs: dcache reduce dput locking npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 17/27] fs: dcache per-bucket dcache hash locking npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` npiggin [this message]
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 19/27] fs: dcache per-inode inode alias locking npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 20/27] fs: icache lock s_inodes list npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 21/27] fs: icache lock inode hash npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 22/27] fs: icache lock i_state npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 23/27] fs: icache lock i_count npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 24/27] fs: icache atomic inodes_stat npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 25/27] fs: icache lock lru/writeback lists npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 26/27] fs: icache protect inode state npiggin
2009-04-25 1:20 ` [patch 27/27] fs: icache remove inode_lock npiggin
2009-04-25 4:18 ` [patch 00/27] [rfc] vfs scalability patchset Al Viro
2009-04-25 5:02 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 8:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-25 8:06 ` Al Viro
2009-04-28 9:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-04-28 9:48 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-28 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-28 11:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-30 6:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-04-25 19:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-25 19:31 ` Al Viro
2009-04-25 20:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-04-25 22:05 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090425012211.654829938@suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).