From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ogawa Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parkn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option
Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:38:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090502063846.GB7905@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090502021258.GJ7681@mit.edu>
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 10:12:58PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> So I don't believe removing the code is the right thing to do. I do
> believe that giving people who build and use the Linux kernel choice
> is a good thing; consider that digital cameras manufactures have
> adhered to a 8.3 filenames, which is encoded in the DCIM standard, for
> 15+ years --- and I don't believe that's an accident. What might lead
> one company to settle and another one to fight and another to decide
> to evade the issue, may depend on many things, and may have very
> little have to do with Truth or Ethics or Morality. Welcome to the
> law and business as practiced in our civilized society.
Still not reason to make this a config option. There's not reason Tom
Tom can't just put a patch in to disable what they want.
Then again I have the feeling this whole thing goes deeper than people
want to make it appear. When a patch authored by person A gets sent by
person B with a total nonsense patch description talking around the
reason why it's submitted Ccing a dozend people something is fishy and I
want this resolved first.
> (But hey, at least we don't torture people! :-)
We don't? Guess I missed the memo..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-02 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-01 20:18 [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option Steve French
2009-05-01 21:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-02 1:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-02 1:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-02 3:02 ` Steve French
2009-05-02 4:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-02 9:15 ` tridge
2009-05-02 9:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-02 9:30 ` tridge
2009-05-02 12:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-03 21:57 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-03 22:25 ` tridge
2009-05-03 22:56 ` Al Viro
2009-05-03 23:15 ` tridge
2009-05-04 5:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-04 6:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 6:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-04 12:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 12:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-04 13:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 13:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-04 14:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 15:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-04 15:36 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-05-04 15:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-04 16:07 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-05-04 16:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-04 16:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 17:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-04 17:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 17:54 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-04 18:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 18:17 ` Al Viro
2009-05-04 20:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 17:06 ` Olivier Galibert
2009-05-04 17:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-04 20:53 ` Chris Friesen
2009-05-04 23:03 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-05 11:09 ` David Newall
2009-05-05 20:56 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-05-05 21:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-05 22:29 ` Steve French
2009-05-05 8:31 ` Zero-day exploit details (Was: Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option) David Newall
2009-05-04 16:11 ` [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 15:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 15:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-04 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 16:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-04 22:12 ` Greg KH
2009-05-05 2:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-05 2:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-05 2:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-05 3:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-05 8:05 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-05-05 15:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-05 21:00 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-05-05 21:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-05 3:08 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-05-04 15:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-04 16:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-04 15:40 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-05-02 6:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-02 2:12 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-02 6:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-01 17:41 Dave Kleikamp
2009-05-01 17:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-01 18:12 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-05-01 18:19 ` Michael Tokarev
2009-05-01 19:09 ` Dave Kleikamp
2009-05-01 18:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-02 10:09 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-02 10:14 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-02 10:26 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-02 10:41 ` tridge
2009-05-02 11:03 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-02 11:13 ` tridge
2009-05-02 11:29 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-02 11:41 ` tridge
2009-05-02 11:59 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-02 12:15 ` tridge
2009-05-02 12:48 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-02 13:06 ` tridge
2009-05-02 14:01 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-27 12:05 ` vimal singh
2009-05-27 23:57 ` tridge
2009-06-04 10:26 ` vimal singh
2009-06-04 21:33 ` tridge
2009-05-02 10:20 ` tridge
2009-05-02 10:32 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-05-03 21:56 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090502063846.GB7905@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parkn \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).