From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 05:22:04 -0400 Message-ID: <20090502092204.GA32066@infradead.org> References: <524f69650905011318m34e0027dt57877d225b3fe2da@mail.gmail.com> <20090501210109.GA3079@infradead.org> <20090502013729.GI6996@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090502015927.GJ8822@parisc-linux.org> <18940.3862.34000.615391@samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthew Wilcox , "Paul E. McKenney" , Christoph Hellwig , Steve French , Dave Kleikamp , Ogawa Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel , Michael Tokarev , LKML To: tridge@samba.org Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:47034 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751541AbZEBJWI (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 05:22:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18940.3862.34000.615391@samba.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 07:15:02PM +1000, tridge@samba.org wrote: > Unfortunately I am unable to discuss any of the non-technical reasons > for why "get the VFAT out" might be a good idea in the first > place. That is damn frustrating, but it is just how things are. At that point you shouldn't even bother to send a patch.