From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:34:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20090504063431.GK7141@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <524f69650905011318m34e0027dt57877d225b3fe2da@mail.gmail.com> <20090501210109.GA3079@infradead.org> <20090502013729.GI6996@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090503225616.GD8633@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <18942.9606.411013.714178@samba.org> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: tridge@samba.org, Al Viro , Pavel Machek , Christoph Hellwig , Matthew Wilcox , Steve French , Dave Kleikamp , Ogawa Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel , Michael Tokarev , LKML To: "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:58968 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751590AbZEDGe3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 02:34:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 10:42:52PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > The only reason I can see for not ultimately talking about things publicly > is if this is one company making shady deals with another company in which > case I do not see why the maintenance burden for those decision should > fall on the linux community as a whole. Another reason is that past experience would indicate that anything we say in public and and will be used against us. Thanx, Paul