From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CONFIG_VFAT_NO_CREATE_WITH_LONGNAMES option Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:56:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20090505215600.GE6890@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20090504161024.GC6740@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090504162252.GB8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090504221208.GB29402@kroah.com> <20090505020149.GE8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090505021121.GA6982@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090505021853.GF8822@parisc-linux.org> <20090505033442.GB6982@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <74785.1241510758@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20090505153527.GA6890@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <109333.1241557208@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Greg KH , "Eric W. Biederman" , tridge@samba.org, Al Viro , Pavel Machek , Christoph Hellwig , Steve French , Dave Kleikamp , Ogawa Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel , Michael Tokarev , LKML To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Return-path: Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:55138 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752918AbZEEV4B (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 17:56:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <109333.1241557208@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 05:00:08PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Tue, 05 May 2009 08:35:27 PDT, "Paul E. McKenney" said: > > > http://books.google.com/books?id=6je0tPcGMzYC&pg=PT822&lpg=PT822&dq=Videotron > ics+v.+Bend+Electronics,+586+F.Supp.+478,+481+(D.+Nev.+1984)&source=bl&ots=ccxO > 5np_uQ&sig=Q0wj4k5uCpMiZybAQe12JlHhh0A&hl=en&ei=Z1kASu2ZJ8eLtgehupyNBw&sa=X&oi= > book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#PPT822,M1 > > > > Dated 2005, cites a 1988 case in footnote 28. Also claims that: > > That would be the same Neundorfer case I found. > > > Copyright Office II Compendium of Copyright Office Practices lists > > acceptable variants to the C in a circle, including "(c)". > > http://www.copyright.gov/compendium/ - I ain't seeing it in there anyplace? > Every occurrence of "(c)" is in either a USC or CFR citation. But of course > that only shows the two chapters modified since 1998. Yee-hah. :) Indeed! :-/ > I suspect it's one of those dark corners of the legal system that nobody > really wants to explore, because there might be a Balrog hiding in the depths > (sort of like the question "Which clause/theory of copyright law authorizes > the copy of a webpage you make while downloading it to read it?" ;) ;-) Thanx, Paul