From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC] fiemap tester Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 05:46:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20090511094639.GA7488@infradead.org> References: <20090508191649.GG9068@unused.rdu.redhat.com> <20090508161318.c73d766c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Josef Bacik , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:55729 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754853AbZEKJqv (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 05:46:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090508161318.c73d766c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:13:18PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 8 May 2009 15:16:49 -0400 > Josef Bacik wrote: > > > Here is small little program which I and Eric have been working on this week to > > better test FIEMAP > > I for one wouldn't complain were someone to create > Documentation/fs/tests/ and to then start filling it with stuff. Why oh why do people think Documentation/ is a good place for code? tests/ would be a much better place :) Last time I brought the idea of a small in-tree test harness up at KS people weren't too fond of it, but if we get more backing now we could try it, otherwise we can just stick it into xfsqa which will hopefully soon be generalized to a general fs QA suite.