From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>, jim owens <jowens@hp.com>,
jmorris@namei.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mtk.manpages@gm
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] The reflink(2) system call v4.
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:53:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090515205335.GB25787@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090515164209.GD31454@mail.oracle.com>
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 09:42:09AM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:55:25AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > Consider a program that wants to always preserve attributes on the
> > reflinks it creates. If the interface allows the program to explicitly
> > request that behavior and returns an error when the request cannot be
> > honored, then the program knows that upon a successful return, the
> > attributes were in fact preserved. If the interface instead silently
> > selects a behavior based on the current privileges of the process and
> > gives no indication to the caller as to what behavior was selected, then
> > the opportunity for error is great.
>
> I get that. I'm looking at what the programming interface is.
> What's the standard function for "I want the fallback behavior" called?
> What's the standard function for "I want preserve security" called?
> "int reflink(oldpath, newpath)" has to pick one of the behaviors. Which
> is it?
Ok, I've been casting about how to solve the concern and provide
a decent interface. I'm not about to give up on either. I think,
though, that we do have to let the application signal its intent to the
system. And if we're doing that, let's add a little flexibility.
I think the interface will be this (ignoring the reflinkat(2)
bit for now):
int reflink(const char *oldpath, const char *newpath, int preserve);
- Data and xattrs are reflinked always.
- 'preserve is a bitfield describing which attributes to keep across the
reflink:
* REFLINK_ATTR_OWNER - Keeps uid/gid the same. Requires ownership or
CAP_CHOWN.
* REFLINK_ATTR_SECURITY - Keeps the security state (SELinux/SMACK/etc)
the same. This requires REFLINK_ATTR_OWNER (the security state makes
no sense if the ownership changes). If not set, the filesystem wipes
all security.* xattrs and reinitializes with
security_inode_init_security() just like a new file.
* REFLINK_ATTR_MODE - Keeps the mode bits the same. Requires ownership
or CAP_FOWNER.
* REFLINK_ATTR_ACL - Keeps the ACLs the same. Requires
REFLINK_ATTR_MODE, as ACLs have to get adjusted when the mode
changes, and so you can't keep them the same if the mode wasn't
preserved. If not set, the filesystem reinits the ACLs as for a new
file.
- REFLINK_ATTR_NONE is 0 and REFLINK_ATTR_ALL is ~0.
That's all the relevant attributes. The timestamps behave as
already described (ctime is now, mtime matches the source), which is the
only sane behavior for this sort of thing.
So, a copy program would reflink(source, target,
REFLINK_ATTR_NONE), a snapshot program would reflink(source, target,
REFLINK_ATTR_ALL), and someone wanting the fallback behavior can do it
easily.
In the kernel, security_inode_reflink() gets passed the preserve
bits. It's responsible for determining whether REFLINK_ATTR_SECURITY is
allowed (vfs_reflink() will already have asserted REFLINK_ATTR_OWNER).
It may do other checks on the reflink and the preserve bits, that's up
to the LSM.
For scripting, we add the we add the '-p' and '-P' to "ln -r":
- ln -r == reflink(source, target, REFLINK_ATTR_NONE);
- ln -r -P == reflink(source, target, REFLINK_ATTR_ALL);
- ln -r -p == the fallback behavior. This is like cp(1), where "cp -p"
is best-effort.
Does this make everyone happy?
Joel
--
"In the beginning, the universe was created. This has made a lot
of people very angry, and is generally considered to have been a
bad move."
- Douglas Adams
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-15 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 151+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-03 6:15 [RFC] The reflink(2) system call Joel Becker
2009-05-03 6:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs: Document the " Joel Becker
2009-05-03 8:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-04 2:46 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-04 6:36 ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-05-04 7:12 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-03 13:08 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-03 23:08 ` Al Viro
2009-05-04 2:49 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-03 23:45 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-04 1:44 ` Tao Ma
2009-05-04 18:25 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-04 21:18 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2009-05-04 22:23 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-05 6:55 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-05 1:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 7:16 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-05 8:09 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-05-05 16:56 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-05 21:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-05-05 21:32 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-06 7:15 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Theodore Tso
2009-05-06 14:24 ` jim owens
2009-05-06 14:30 ` jim owens
2009-05-06 17:50 ` jim owens
2009-05-12 19:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-12 19:30 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-12 19:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-12 19:37 ` jim owens
2009-05-12 20:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 13:01 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-05 13:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 13:39 ` Chris Mason
2009-05-05 15:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 15:41 ` Chris Mason
2009-05-05 16:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 16:18 ` Chris Mason
2009-05-05 20:48 ` jim owens
2009-05-05 21:57 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 22:04 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-05 22:11 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 22:24 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-05 23:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 22:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 22:21 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-05 22:32 ` James Morris
2009-05-05 22:39 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-12 19:40 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 22:28 ` jim owens
2009-05-05 23:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 16:46 ` Jörn Engel
2009-05-05 16:54 ` Jörn Engel
2009-05-05 22:03 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 21:44 ` copyfile semantics Andreas Dilger
2009-05-05 21:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-05 22:25 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-05 22:06 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-06 5:57 ` Jörn Engel
2009-05-05 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] fs: Document the reflink(2) system call Theodore Tso
2009-05-05 15:32 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 22:49 ` James Morris
2009-05-05 17:05 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-05 17:00 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-05 17:29 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-05 22:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 22:30 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 22:37 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-05 23:08 ` jim owens
2009-05-05 13:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-05 17:09 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-03 6:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] fs: Add vfs_reflink() and the ->reflink() inode operation Joel Becker
2009-05-03 8:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-04 2:51 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-03 6:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs: Add the reflink(2) system call Joel Becker
2009-05-03 6:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-05-03 6:39 ` Al Viro
2009-05-03 7:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-03 11:16 ` Al Viro
2009-05-04 2:53 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-04 2:53 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-03 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-07 22:15 ` [RFC] The reflink(2) system call v2 Joel Becker
2009-05-08 1:39 ` James Morris
2009-05-08 1:49 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-08 13:01 ` Tetsuo Handa
2009-05-08 2:59 ` jim owens
2009-05-08 3:10 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-08 11:53 ` jim owens
2009-05-08 12:16 ` jim owens
2009-05-08 14:11 ` jim owens
2009-05-11 20:40 ` [RFC] The reflink(2) system call v4 Joel Becker
2009-05-11 22:27 ` James Morris
2009-05-11 22:34 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-12 1:12 ` James Morris
2009-05-12 12:18 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-12 17:22 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-12 17:32 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-12 18:03 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-12 18:04 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-12 18:28 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-12 18:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-14 18:06 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-14 18:25 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-14 23:25 ` James Morris
2009-05-15 11:54 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-15 13:35 ` James Morris
2009-05-15 15:44 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-13 1:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2009-05-13 16:43 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-13 17:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-13 18:27 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-12 12:01 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-11 23:11 ` jim owens
2009-05-11 23:42 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-12 11:31 ` Jörn Engel
2009-05-12 13:12 ` jim owens
2009-05-12 20:24 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-14 18:43 ` Jörn Engel
2009-05-12 15:04 ` Sage Weil
2009-05-12 15:23 ` jim owens
2009-05-12 16:16 ` Sage Weil
2009-05-12 17:45 ` jim owens
2009-05-12 20:29 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-12 17:28 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-13 4:30 ` Sage Weil
2009-05-14 3:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2009-05-14 18:12 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-14 22:00 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-15 1:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-05-15 12:01 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-15 15:22 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-15 15:55 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-15 16:42 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-15 17:01 ` Shaya Potter
2009-05-15 20:53 ` Joel Becker [this message]
2009-05-18 9:17 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jörn Engel
2009-05-18 13:02 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-18 14:33 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-18 17:15 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-05-18 18:26 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-19 16:32 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Sage Weil
2009-05-19 19:33 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-05-19 20:15 ` Jamie Lokier
[not found] ` <20090519132057.419b9de0@bike.lwn.net>
[not found] ` <20090519193244.GB25521@mail.oracle.com>
2009-05-19 19:41 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-05-28 0:24 ` [RFC] The reflink(2) system call v5 Joel Becker
2009-09-14 22:24 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-11 20:49 ` [RFC] The reflink(2) system call v2 Joel Becker
2009-05-11 22:49 ` jim owens
2009-05-11 23:46 ` Joel Becker
2009-05-12 0:54 ` Chris Mason
2009-05-12 20:36 ` Jamie Lokier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090515205335.GB25787@mail.oracle.com \
--to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=jowens@hp.com \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gm \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).