From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] The reflink(2) system call v4. Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:17:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20090518091749.GA23996@logfs.org> References: <20090508031018.GB8611@mail.oracle.com> <20090511204011.GB30293@mail.oracle.com> <4A0B96C6.40702@mit.edu> <1242324765.21772.95.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090514220029.GB30410@mail.oracle.com> <1242388905.29973.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090515152212.GA31454@mail.oracle.com> <1242402925.29973.163.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090515164209.GD31454@mail.oracle.com> <20090515205335.GB25787@mail.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Stephen Smalley , Andy Lutomirski , jim owens , jmorris@namei.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Joel Becker Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090515205335.GB25787@mail.oracle.com> Sender: linux-security-module-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:53:35 -0700, Joel Becker wrote: >=20 > Does this make everyone happy? Provided the only fallback is to return an error code and let userspace decide what to do, I'm a happy camper. Not sure how many of the REFLINK_ATTR_* flags will actually be used, apart from ALL and NONE. But I don't mind having them. J=C3=B6rn --=20 People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them that Benjamin Franklin said it first. -- unknown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-securit= y-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html