From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Dump the inode structure (for debugging purposes only) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:09:42 -0600 Message-ID: <20090521200942.GA5110@parisc-linux.org> References: <1242936063-31689-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1242936063-31689-2-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1242936063-31689-3-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1242936063-31689-4-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1242936063-31689-5-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <1242936063-31689-6-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:42206 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754445AbZEUUJl (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2009 16:09:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1242936063-31689-6-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 04:01:03PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > This is not intended for merging; but it's useful for determining how > much varous fields in the struct inode space, and whether there is any > padding leading to waste, especially on a 64-bit platforms. Why not just use acme's pahole? -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."