linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] readahead:add blk_run_backing_dev
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:05:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090522010538.GB6010@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.20.2.20090521145005.06f81fe0@172.19.0.2>

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 02:01:47PM +0800, Hisashi Hifumi wrote:
> 
> At 11:51 09/05/20, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> >On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 07:53:00PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 18 2009, Hisashi Hifumi wrote:
> >> > Hi.
> >> > 
> >> > I wrote a patch that adds blk_run_backing_dev on page_cache_async_readahead
> >> > so readahead I/O is unpluged to improve throughput.
> >> > 
> >> > Following is the test result with dd.
> >> > 
> >> > #dd if=testdir/testfile of=/dev/null bs=16384
> >> > 
> >> > -2.6.30-rc6
> >> > 1048576+0 records in
> >> > 1048576+0 records out
> >> > 17179869184 bytes (17 GB) copied, 224.182 seconds, 76.6 MB/s
> >> > 
> >> > -2.6.30-rc6-patched
> >> > 1048576+0 records in
> >> > 1048576+0 records out
> >> > 17179869184 bytes (17 GB) copied, 206.465 seconds, 83.2 MB/s
> >> > 
> >> > Sequential read performance on a big file was improved.
> >> > Please merge my patch.
> >> > 
> >> > Thanks.
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
> >> > 
> >> > diff -Nrup linux-2.6.30-rc6.org/mm/readahead.c 
> >linux-2.6.30-rc6.unplug/mm/readahead.c
> >> > --- linux-2.6.30-rc6.org/mm/readahead.c	2009-05-18 10:46:15.000000000 +0900
> >> > +++ linux-2.6.30-rc6.unplug/mm/readahead.c	2009-05-18 
> >13:00:42.000000000 +0900
> >> > @@ -490,5 +490,7 @@ page_cache_async_readahead(struct addres
> >> >  
> >> >  	/* do read-ahead */
> >> >  	ondemand_readahead(mapping, ra, filp, true, offset, req_size);
> >> > +
> >> > +	blk_run_backing_dev(mapping->backing_dev_info, NULL);
> >> >  }
> >> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_cache_async_readahead);
> >> 
> >> I'm surprised this makes much of a difference. It seems correct to me to
> >> NOT unplug the device, since it will get unplugged when someone ends up
> >> actually waiting for a page. And that will then kick off the remaining
> >> IO as well. For this dd case, you'll be hitting lock_page() for the
> >> readahead page really soon, definitely not long enough to warrant such a
> >> big difference in speed.
> >
> >The possible timing change of this patch is (assuming readahead size=100):
> >
> >T0   read(100), which triggers readahead(200, 100)
> >T1   read(101)
> >T2   read(102)
> >...
> >T100 read(200), find_get_page(200) => readahead(300, 100)
> >                lock_page(200) => implicit unplug
> >
> >The readahead(200, 100) submitted at time T0 *might* be delayed to the
> >unplug time of T100.
> >
> >But that is only a possibility. In normal cases, the read(200) would
> >be blocking and there will be a lock_page(200) that will immediately
> >unplug device for readahead(300, 100).
> 
> 
> Hi Andrew.
> Following patch improves sequential read performance and does not harm
> other performance.
> Please merge my patch.
> Comments?
> Thanks.
> 
> #dd if=testdir/testfile of=/dev/null bs=16384
> -2.6.30-rc6
> 1048576+0 records in
> 1048576+0 records out
> 17179869184 bytes (17 GB) copied, 224.182 seconds, 76.6 MB/s
> 
> -2.6.30-rc6-patched
> 1048576+0 records in
> 1048576+0 records out
> 17179869184 bytes (17 GB) copied, 206.465 seconds, 83.2 MB/s
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
> 
> diff -Nrup linux-2.6.30-rc6.org/mm/readahead.c linux-2.6.30-rc6.unplug/mm/readahead.c
> --- linux-2.6.30-rc6.org/mm/readahead.c	2009-05-18 10:46:15.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.30-rc6.unplug/mm/readahead.c	2009-05-18 13:00:42.000000000 +0900
> @@ -490,5 +490,7 @@ page_cache_async_readahead(struct addres
>  
>  	/* do read-ahead */
>  	ondemand_readahead(mapping, ra, filp, true, offset, req_size);
> +
> +	blk_run_backing_dev(mapping->backing_dev_info, NULL);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_cache_async_readahead);
> 
> 

Hi Hisashi,

I wonder if the following updated patch can achieve the same
performance.  Can you try testing this out?

Thanks,
Fengguang
---

diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
index 133b6d5..fd3df66 100644
--- a/mm/readahead.c
+++ b/mm/readahead.c
@@ -490,5 +490,8 @@ page_cache_async_readahead(struct address_space *mapping,
 
 	/* do read-ahead */
 	ondemand_readahead(mapping, ra, filp, true, offset, req_size);
+
+	if (PageUptodate(page))
+		blk_run_backing_dev(mapping->backing_dev_info, NULL);		
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(page_cache_async_readahead);

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-22  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-18  9:38 [PATCH] readahead:add blk_run_backing_dev Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-18 17:53 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-19  0:44   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-19 10:05   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-20  0:55   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-20  2:51   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-21  6:01     ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-22  1:05       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-05-22  1:44         ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-22  2:33           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-26 23:42             ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  0:25               ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  2:09                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  2:21                   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  2:35                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-27  2:36                     ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  2:38                       ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  3:55                       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  4:06                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-27  4:36                           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  6:20                             ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-28  1:20                             ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-28  2:23                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-01  1:39                                 ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-06-01  2:23                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-27  2:36                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  2:47                       ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  2:57                         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  3:06                           ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  3:26                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-01  2:37                             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-01  2:51                               ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-06-01  3:02                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-01  3:06                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-01  3:07                                   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-06-01  4:30                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  2:07               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-20  1:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-20  1:43   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-20  2:52     ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090522010538.GB6010@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).