linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	chris.mason@oracle.com, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, jack@suse.cz,
	yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com, richard@rsk.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v7
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 17:25:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090526152501.GA20968@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1243330430-9964-1-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>

Hello,

I have been playing with v7 since your sending and after a white (short
on laptop, longer on desktop, a few hours), writeback doesn't seem to
work anymore. Manual call to sync hangs (process in D state) and Dirty
value in meminfo gets growing. As previous versions had been heavily
tested, I guess there is some regression in v7.


Best

Damien Wyart

> Here's the 7th version of the writeback patches. Changes since
> v5/v6:

> - Move the sync_supers() to the global bdi_forker_task() thread, so we
>   don't writeback the supers from all the bdi kupdated() tasks.
> - Make bdi_start_writeback() and bdi_writeback_all() be sync when called
>   with WB_SYNC_ALL only.
> - Shuffle some more things around to make a cleaner series. The sync vs
>   async nature of bdi_writeback_all() and bdi_start_writeback() isn't
>   consistent through the series, but otherwise things should be sane.

> I'd appreciate if Richard and Yanmin could re-run testing with this,
> just to make sure that things are sane. For ease of patching, I've
> put the full diff here:

>   http://kernel.dk/writeback-v7.patch

> and also stored this in a writeback-v7 branch that will not change,
> you can pull that into Linus tree from here:

>   git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block.git writeback-v7


-- 
Damien Wyart

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-26 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-26  9:33 [PATCH 0/12] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v7 Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 01/12] ntfs: remove old debug check for dirty data in ntfs_put_super() Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 02/12] btrfs: properly register fs backing device Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 03/12] writeback: move dirty inodes from super_block to backing_dev_info Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 04/12] writeback: switch to per-bdi threads for flushing data Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 05/12] writeback: get rid of pdflush completely Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 06/12] writeback: separate the flushing state/task from the bdi Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 07/12] writeback: support > 1 flusher thread per bdi Jens Axboe
2009-06-04 17:44   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-04 19:48     ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 08/12] writeback: include default_backing_dev_info in writeback Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 09/12] writeback: allow sleepy exit of default writeback task Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 10/12] writeback: add some debug inode list counters to bdi stats Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 11/12] writeback: add name to backing_dev_info Jens Axboe
2009-05-26  9:33 ` [PATCH 12/12] writeback: check for registered bdi in flusher add and inode dirty Jens Axboe
2009-05-26 15:25 ` Damien Wyart [this message]
2009-05-26 16:41   ` [PATCH 0/12] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v7 Jens Axboe
2009-05-26 17:08     ` Damien Wyart
2009-05-26 17:10       ` Damien Wyart
2009-05-26 20:47       ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-26 21:11         ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  5:21           ` Damien Wyart
2009-05-27  5:49             ` Damien Wyart
2009-05-27  9:20               ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 13:15                 ` Damien Wyart
2009-05-27 15:05                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 21:06                     ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-28 10:20                       ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  6:17             ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  5:27 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-05-27  6:17   ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-02  2:07     ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-06-02 11:53       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090526152501.GA20968@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=damien.wyart@free.fr \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@rsk.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).