linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] readahead:add blk_run_backing_dev
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:42:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090526164252.0741b392.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090522023323.GA10864@localhost>

On Fri, 22 May 2009 10:33:23 +0800
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:

> > I tested above patch, and I got same performance number.
> > I wonder why if (PageUptodate(page)) check is there...
> 
> Thanks!  This is an interesting micro timing behavior that
> demands some research work.  The above check is to confirm if it's
> the PageUptodate() case that makes the difference. So why that case
> happens so frequently so as to impact the performance? Will it also
> happen in NFS?
> 
> The problem is readahead IO pipeline is not running smoothly, which is
> undesirable and not well understood for now.

The patch causes a remarkably large performance increase.  A 9%
reduction in time for a linear read?  I'd be surprised if the workload
even consumed 9% of a CPU, so where on earth has the kernel gone to?

Have you been able to reproduce this in your testing?

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-26 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-18  9:38 [PATCH] readahead:add blk_run_backing_dev Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-18 17:53 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-19  0:44   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-19 10:05   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-20  0:55   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-20  2:51   ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-21  6:01     ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-22  1:05       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-22  1:44         ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-22  2:33           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-26 23:42             ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-05-27  0:25               ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  2:09                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  2:21                   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  2:35                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-27  2:36                     ` Andrew Morton
2009-05-27  2:38                       ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  3:55                       ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  4:06                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-27  4:36                           ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  6:20                             ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-28  1:20                             ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-28  2:23                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-01  1:39                                 ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-06-01  2:23                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-27  2:36                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  2:47                       ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  2:57                         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  3:06                           ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-27  3:26                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-01  2:37                             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-01  2:51                               ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-06-01  3:02                                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-01  3:06                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-01  3:07                                   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-06-01  4:30                                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-27  2:07               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-05-20  1:07 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-20  1:43   ` Hisashi Hifumi
2009-05-20  2:52     ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090526164252.0741b392.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).