linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	chris.mason@oracle.com, david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com,
	richard@rsk.demon.co.uk, damien.wyart@free.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] writeback: support > 1 flusher thread per bdi
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:58:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090528135800.GN29199@duck.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090528125308.GA11363@kernel.dk>

On Thu 28-05-09 14:53:08, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, May 28 2009, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > >   Looking into this, it seems a bit complex with all that on_stack, sync /
> > > > nosync thing. Wouldn't a simple refcounting scheme be more clear? Alloc /
> > > > init_work_on_stack gets a reference from bdi_work, queue_work gets another
> > > > reference passed later to flusher thread. We drop the reference when we
> > > > leave bdi_start_writeback() and when flusher thread is done with the work.
> > > > When refcount hits zero, work struct is freed (when work is on stack, we
> > > > just never drop the last reference)...
> > > 
> > > It wouldn't change the complexity of the stack vs non-stack at all,
> > > since you have to do the same checks for when it's safe to proceed. And
> > > having the single bit there with the hash bit wait queues makes that bit
> > > easier.
> >   I think it would be simpler. Look:
> > static void bdi_work_free(struct rcu_head *head)
> > {
> > 	struct bdi_work *work = container_of(head, struct bdi_work, rcu_head);
> > 
> > 	kfree(work);
> > }
> > 
> > static void bdi_put_work(struct bdi_work *work)
> > {
> > 	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&work->count, 1))
> > 		call_rcu(&work->rcu_head, bdi_work_free);
> > }
> > 
> > static void wb_work_complete(struct bdi_work *work)
> > {
> > 	bdi_work_clear(work);
> > 	bdi_put_work(work);
> > }
> > 
> > void bdi_start_writeback(...)
> > {
> > 	...
> > 	if (must_wait || work == &work_stack)
> > 		bdi_wait_on_work_clear(work);
> > 	if (work != &work_stack)
> > 		bdi_put_work(work);
> > }
> > 
> >   IMO much easier to read...
> 
> And doesn't work, since you cannot exit after clearing the on-stack work
> before before rcu is quisced. The bdi_work could be browseable by other
> threads under rcu_read_lock(), just like you defer the kfree(), you have
> to defer the bdi_work_clear() for on-stack work.
  Right. My fault. Sorry for the noise.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-28 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-27  9:41 [PATCH 0/11] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v8 Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] ntfs: remove old debug check for dirty data in ntfs_put_super() Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] btrfs: properly register fs backing device Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] writeback: move dirty inodes from super_block to backing_dev_info Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] writeback: switch to per-bdi threads for flushing data Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 11:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-05-27 11:24     ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 15:14   ` Jan Kara
2009-05-27 17:50     ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-28 14:45       ` Jan Kara
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] writeback: get rid of pdflush completely Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] writeback: separate the flushing state/task from the bdi Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: support > 1 flusher thread per bdi Jens Axboe
2009-05-28  9:27   ` Jan Kara
2009-05-28 10:40     ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-28 12:43       ` Jan Kara
2009-05-28 12:53         ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-28 13:58           ` Jan Kara [this message]
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] writeback: allow sleepy exit of default writeback task Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] writeback: add some debug inode list counters to bdi stats Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 10/11] writeback: add name to backing_dev_info Jens Axboe
2009-05-27  9:41 ` [PATCH 11/11] writeback: check for registered bdi in flusher add and inode dirty Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 12:41 ` [PATCH 0/11] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v8 Richard Kennedy
2009-05-27 12:47   ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 14:47 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-27 15:05   ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 17:53   ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-27 17:57     ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 17:58     ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-27 18:14       ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 19:15         ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-27 19:45           ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-28  0:49             ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-28  9:28               ` Jan Kara
2009-05-28  9:36                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-28 15:23                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-05-28 19:32                   ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-28 19:38                     ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-28 11:46 [PATCH 0/11] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v9 Jens Axboe
2009-05-28 11:46 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: support > 1 flusher thread per bdi Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090528135800.GN29199@duck.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=damien.wyart@free.fr \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@rsk.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).