From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
To: Brian Molnar <brian.molnar@gmail.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fgetattr/fsetattr file operation
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:04:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090604190424.GI9002@webber.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7ee1e6e0906041042q44dbc1a6ge7b82dc0736bc6f5@mail.gmail.com>
On Jun 04, 2009 10:42 -0700, Brian Molnar wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> > Can you tell us a bit more about your use case, and how you worked
> > around the limitation?
>
> In this FS, when a process opens a file for write mode access, it
> maintains its own private copy of the file until it comes time to
> close. Upon close, this private copy is "committed" and replaces the
> file on-disk. Meanwhile, while the file is open for writing (before
> close) the file on-disk remains untouched (both data and metadata).
> Thus, any metadata-changing operations that take place against the
> file descriptor must only be seen to the process(es) using that file
> descriptor. The intended behavior is that an fstat(2) against the file
> descriptor will return the attributes corresponding to the
> uncommitted, private copy and a path-based stat(2) will return the
> attributes of the file on-disk.
This sounds very strange - different processes (or even the same
process using different file handles) will see different results
for fstat() which are yet different from stat(). I can't imagine
that applications would like this at all.
> To achieve this behavior,
Maybe you should go back and explain why this behaviour is useful,
before we burden the kernel with it.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-04 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-03 17:32 fgetattr/fsetattr file operation Brian Molnar
2009-06-04 10:27 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-06-04 17:42 ` Brian Molnar
2009-06-04 19:04 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2009-06-04 19:46 ` Brian Molnar
2009-06-05 10:35 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-06-08 1:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-08 22:26 ` Brian Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090604190424.GI9002@webber.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=brian.molnar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).