From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/12] make ->sync_fs mandatory
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:02:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090608080252.GA20735@lst.de> (raw)
Currently the superblock methods are a bit confusing. There is the
newer ->sync_fs method which is unconditionally called from
__sync_filesystem for data integrity writebacks. And there is the older
->write_super which is called from pdflush for the periodic superblock
writeback, but also from __sync_filesystem just before calling
->sync_fs. (And still from file_fsync, but that is about to go away).
This series makes sure all filesystems that need superblock writeouts
define a ->sync_fs so we can stop calling ->write_super for the data
integrity writeback. This means the presence of ->write_super indicates
a filesystem does want periodic superblock writeback and can implement
these independently from the data integrity writeback. It also means
we don't need to bother with possible s_dirt races for the data
integrity syncs.
This patch series first adds ->sync_fs methods to all filesystems having
->write_super, often refactoring the code in that are (and also
preparing the ->write_super instances for moving MS_RDONLY checking into
the caller), then it makes sure the existing ->sync_fs instaces cover
the work previously done in ->write_super for the two cases where they
differed widely, and lastly removes the call to ->write_super from
__sync_filesystem.
next reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-08 8:02 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-06-08 8:03 ` [PATCH 1/12] affs: add ->sync_fs Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:03 ` [PATCH 2/12] bfs: " Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:03 ` [PATCH 3/12] exofs: " Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-09 13:03 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH 4/12] ext2: " Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH 0/12] make ->sync_fs mandatory Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:04 ` [PATCH 6/12] hfs: add ->sync_fs Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:05 ` [PATCH 7/12] hfsplus: " Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:07 ` [PATCH 8/12] sysv: " Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:08 ` [PATCH 9/12] ufs: " Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:08 ` [PATCH 10/12] jffs2: call jffs2_write_super from jffs2_sync_fs Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:08 ` [PATCH 11/12] nilfs2: call nilfs2_write_super from nilfs2_sync_fs Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 8:08 ` [PATCH 12/12] remove the call to ->write_super in __sync_filesystem Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-08 14:45 ` [PATCH 0/12] make ->sync_fs mandatory Al Viro
2009-06-09 12:55 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090608080252.GA20735@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).