linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masayoshi MIZUMA <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: skip new or to-be-freed inodes
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:29:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090608092930.GA13846@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A2CB7AE.6080909@gmail.com>

Hi Artem,

On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:03:10PM +0800, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > The above race and warning didn't turn up because writeback_inodes() holds
> > the s_umount lock, so generic_forget_inode() finds MS_ACTIVE and returns
> > early. But we are not sure the UBIFS calls and future callers will guarantee
> > that. So skip I_WILL_FREE inodes for the sake of safety.
>
> The inode states are a bit vague for me, but vs. UBIFS - feel
> free to ask questions.

Thank you. Basically I'm not sure if UBIFS guarantees it won't be
unmounted (hence the MS_ACTIVE bit is on) when calling
generic_sync_sb_inodes() in shrink_liability() and ubifs_sync_fs().

Thanks,
Fengguang

PS: our previous discussions

        > > Another possibility:
        > >
        > > generic_forget_inode
        > >   inode->i_state |= I_WILL_FREE;
        > >   spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
        > >                                                 generic_sync_sb_inodes()
        > >                                                   spin_lock(&inode_lock);
        > >                                                   __iget(inode);
        > >                                                   __writeback_single_inode
        > >                                                     // see non zero i_count
        > >                                                     WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_WILL_FREE);
        > >
        > > I'm wondering why didn't we saw reports on the last WARN_ON()?
        > > Did we missed something?
        >   I meant the above race in my description ;-). Anyway, the race can happen
        > only if we are unmounting the filesystem (normally, we bail out on
        > sb->s_flags & MS_ACTIVE check - yes, it's a bit hidden and it also took me
        > a while to understand why we weren't seeing tons of warnings...).

        Ah OK. Just checked that all three callers of generic_sync_sb_inodes():
        - writeback_inodes(): umount prevented
        - pohmelfs_kill_super(): just before umount
        - ubifs calls: too complex to be obvious..
        At least the first two cases are safe, so we didn't see the error report ;)


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-08  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-18  8:13 [PATCH][BUG] Lack of mutex_lock in drop_pagecache_sb() Masasyoshi MIZUMA
2009-03-23 10:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-24  7:06   ` Masayoshi MIZUMA
2009-03-24  7:44     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-24 12:05       ` Jan Kara
2009-03-24 12:11         ` Wu Fengguang
2009-03-24 12:40         ` [PATCH] skip I_CLEAR state inodes Wu Fengguang
2009-03-30  7:18           ` [PATCH][RESEND for 2.6.29-rc8-mm1] " Wu Fengguang
2009-03-31 23:43             ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-01  0:53               ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-01 21:38           ` [PATCH] " Eric Sandeen
2009-06-02  8:55             ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-02 10:27               ` Jeff Layton
2009-06-02 11:37               ` Jan Kara
2009-06-02 21:48                 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-03 10:45                   ` Jeff Layton
2009-06-03 13:32                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-03 14:00                   ` Jan Kara
2009-06-03 14:10                 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-03 14:16                   ` Jan Kara
2009-06-03 14:47                     ` Wu Fengguang
2009-06-06  3:07                       ` [PATCH] writeback: skip new or to-be-freed inodes Wu Fengguang
2009-06-08  7:03                         ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-08  9:29                           ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-06-08 10:45                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-09  7:24                               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-09  7:03                             ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-06-08 17:07                         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090608092930.GA13846@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).