From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: linux-next: next-20090609 hangs in early user mode Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:31:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20090610083139.GA25538@infradead.org> References: <20090610180058.99bd3dda.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: LKML , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:36158 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754397AbZFJIbi (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:31:38 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090610180058.99bd3dda.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:00:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The machines are PowerPC64 (so big endian). It looks to me like we use > bitops on i_state - don't our bitops only apply to unsigned longs? Yes, bitops need unsigned long. And on most plaforms should give you warnings when using them on the wrong type.