From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: deadlocks with fs quotas
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:31:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090627183129.GB31902@duck.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5df78e1d0906261805n198639ddoe6b5a0856a065bfd@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
On Fri 26-06-09 18:05:15, Jiaying Zhang wrote:
> I am looking at the fs quota code while debugging a deadlock problem
> on ext2 file system. I found there is a potential deadlock between quotaon
> and quotaoff (or quotasync). Basically, all of quotactl operations need to
> be protected by dqonoff_mutex. vfs_quota_off and vfs_quota_sync also call
> sb->s_op->quota_write that needs to grab the i_mutex of the quota file.
> But in vfs_quota_on_inode (called from quotaon operation), the current
> code tries to grab the i_mutex of the quota file first before getting
> quonoff_mutex.
>
> Here is a simple test to show the problem:
> $ while true; do quotaon /dev/hda >&/dev/null; usleep $RANDOM; done &
> $ while true; do quotaoff /dev/hda >&/dev/null; usleep $RANDOM; done &
>
> After running for a while, the two processes get deadlocked.
> Below is my proposed change to fix the problem:
Thanks for the analysis and the patch. You are right, it is a bug and your
fix seems to be correct. Only, we should also use I_MUTEX_QUOTA for
acquiring i_mutex to be consistent with other places (and silence lockdep).
> Index: git-linux/fs/quota/dquot.c
> ===================================================================
> --- git-linux.orig/fs/quota/dquot.c 2009-05-20 18:05:55.000000000 -0700
> +++ git-linux/fs/quota/dquot.c 2009-06-26 17:57:04.000000000 -0700
> @@ -2042,8 +2042,8 @@
> * changes */
> invalidate_bdev(sb->s_bdev);
> }
> - mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> mutex_lock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> if (sb_has_quota_loaded(sb, type)) {
> error = -EBUSY;
> goto out_lock;
> @@ -2094,7 +2094,6 @@
> dqopt->files[type] = NULL;
> iput(inode);
> out_lock:
> - mutex_unlock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
> if (oldflags != -1) {
> down_write(&dqopt->dqptr_sem);
> /* Set the flags back (in the case of accidental quotaon()
> @@ -2104,6 +2103,7 @@
> up_write(&dqopt->dqptr_sem);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> + mutex_unlock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
> out_fmt:
> put_quota_format(fmt);
>
>
> Also while debugging the problem, I found the following code path:
>
> shrink_icache_memory -> prune_icache (grab iprune_mutex) -> dispose_list ->
> clear_inode -> dquot_drop -> dqput -> dquot_release ->
> dqopt->ops[dquot->dq_type]->write_file_info ->
> sb->s_op->quota_write (i.e., ext2_quota_write for ext2)
Yes, I'm aware of this.
> AFAICT, it seems very deadlock prone that the quota system tries to write
> the quota file while clearing an inode. The ext2_quota_write calls
> ext2_get_block that may block at alloc_page that in turn may try to call
> shrink_icache_memory when the system is low in memory. But the
> iprune_mutex is already hold by the process so the system will get
> into deadlock here. I haven't got a test case that shows the deadlock but
> want to raise this issue here first to see if I have missed anything.
I guess, you mean page allocation from sb_bread() or similar functions...
The point is that all these functions should perform allocations with GFP_FS
flag cleared and thus we can never reenter the inode pruning (or any other
filesystem) code.
Honza
PS: I'm going on vacation for a week, I'll merge your patch when I return.
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-27 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-27 1:05 deadlocks with fs quotas Jiaying Zhang
2009-06-27 18:31 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2009-06-30 0:12 ` Jiaying Zhang
2009-07-07 16:08 ` Jan Kara
2009-07-07 18:19 ` Jiaying Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090627183129.GB31902@duck.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).