From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: npiggin@suse.de
Subject: [patch 0/5] new truncate sequence patchset
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:30:28 +1000
Message-ID: <20090710073028.782561541@suse.de>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33630 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750948AbZGJHeW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:34:22 -0400
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Hi,

I decided to keep the ATTR_SIZE masking code in there. I think
inode_setattr should basically be a simple_setattr, and attribute
masking is not too unusual. If there is large demand, then we
could impement a notruncate_setattr function to avoid masking, but
for now I think this is OK.

Please consider this for merging.

Thanks,
Nick