From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Why does __do_page_cache_readahead submit READ, not READA?
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:55:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090729225501.GH24801@think> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090729211845.GB4148@kernel.dk>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:18:45PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29 2009, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > I naively assumed, from the "readahead" in the name, that readahead
> > would be submitting READA bios. It does not.
> >
> > I recently did some statistics on how many READ and READA requests
> > we actually see on the block device level.
> > I was suprised that READA is basically only used for file system
> > internal meta data (and not even for all file systems),
> > but _never_ for file data.
> >
> > A simple
> > dd if=bigfile of=/dev/null bs=4k count=1
> > will absolutely cause readahead of the configured amount, no problem.
> > But on the block device level, these are READ requests, where I'd
> > expected them to be READA requests, based on the name.
> >
> > This is because __do_page_cache_readahead() calls read_pages(),
> > which in turn is mapping->a_ops->readpages(), or, as fallback,
> > mapping->a_ops->readpage().
> >
> > On that level, all variants end up submitting as READ.
> >
> > This may even be intentional.
> > But if so, I'd like to understand that.
>
> I don't think it's intentional, and if memory serves, we used to use
> READA when submitting read-ahead. Not sure how best to improve the
> situation, since (as you describe), we lose the read-ahead vs normal
> read at that level. I did some experimentation some time ago for
> flagging this, see:
>
> http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commitdiff;h=16cfe64e3568cda412b3cf6b7b891331946b595e
>
> which should pass down READA properly.
One of the problems in the past was that reada would fail if there
wasn't a free request when we actually wanted it to go ahead and wait.
Or something. We've switched it around a few times I think.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-29 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-29 16:14 Why does __do_page_cache_readahead submit READ, not READA? Lars Ellenberg
2009-07-29 21:18 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-29 22:55 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2009-07-30 6:06 ` Jens Axboe
2009-07-30 14:34 ` Chris Mason
2009-07-30 16:47 ` Jeff Moyer
2009-07-30 16:56 ` Chris Mason
2009-08-03 7:52 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-03 7:59 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-03 8:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-03 9:25 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-03 9:34 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-03 9:37 ` Jens Axboe
2009-08-03 9:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-08-03 14:26 ` [dm-devel] " James Bottomley
2009-08-03 21:03 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090729225501.GH24801@think \
--to=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).