From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: Cleanup generic_osync_inode?
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:21:54 +0200
Message-ID: <20090815152154.GA11355@lst.de>
References: <20090814214831.GB8118@duck.suse.cz> <20090815151232.GB7713@lst.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:58625 "EHLO verein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754556AbZHOPVz (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:21:55 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090815151232.GB7713@lst.de>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>


And actually merge our new helper generic_osync_inode.  We should
never had those two different helpers doing pretty much the same.