linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] fs: turn iprune_mutex into rwsem
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:57:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090815195742.GA14842@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090814152504.GA19195@wotan.suse.de>

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 05:25:05PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Now I think the main problem is having the filesystem block (and do IO
> in inode reclaim. The problem is that this doesn't get accounted well
> and penalizes a random allocator with a big latency spike caused by
> work generated from elsewhere.
> 
> I think the best idea would be to avoid this. By design if possible,
> or by deferring the hard work to an asynchronous context. If the latter,
> then the fs would probably want to throttle creation of new work with
> queue size of the deferred work, but let's not get into those details.

I don't really see a good way to avoid this.  For any filesystem that
does some sort of preallocations we need to drop them in ->clear_inode.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-15 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-14 15:25 [rfc][patch] fs: turn iprune_mutex into rwsem Nick Piggin
2009-08-14 22:58 ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-14 23:39   ` Jan Kara
2009-08-15  4:45   ` Nick Piggin
2009-08-15  5:14   ` Nick Piggin
2009-08-15 19:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-08-16 10:05   ` Nick Piggin
2009-08-16 22:11   ` Andreas Dilger
2009-08-17  6:34     ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090815195742.GA14842@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).