From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH] splice: update mtime and atime on files Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:35:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20090818083547.GK12579@kernel.dk> References: <20090815064241.GE12579@kernel.dk> <20090818050027.GE11624@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Miklos Szeredi , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Willy Tarreau Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:34384 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755038AbZHRIfq (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:35:46 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090818050027.GE11624@1wt.eu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Aug 18 2009, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 08:42:41AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14 2009, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > From: Miklos Szeredi > > > > > > Splice should update the modification and access times on regular > > > files just like read and write. Not updating mtime will confuse > > > backup tools, etc... > > > > > > This patch only adds the time updates for regular files. For pipes > > > and other special files that splice touches the need for updating the > > > times is less clear. Let's discuss and fix that separately. > > > > Thanks Miklos, I've queued this one up. > > wouldn't it make sense to send that to stable too ? The patch is not > intrusive and looks like a fix to me. It doesn't really meet the stable criteria, as it's not a security issue nor does it crash the kernel. -- Jens Axboe