From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfs compat_ioctl? Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:49:18 -0400 Message-ID: <20090831184918.GB10393@infradead.org> References: <4A9B759B.7020401@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <20090831123010.GA2368@infradead.org> <20090831183751.GC19343@comcast.net> <20090831184822.GA10393@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Tim Walberg , Christoph Hellwig , Michael Tokarev , Linux-kernel , linux-fsdevel Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:37714 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752622AbZHaStR (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:49:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090831184822.GA10393@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 02:48:22PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:37:51PM -0500, Tim Walberg wrote: > > Linux sparcy 2.6.30.4-sparcy #2 Sat Aug 1 21:14:46 CDT 2009 sparc64 GNU/Linux > > sparcy:~# file $(which xfs_fsr) > > /usr/sbin/xfs_fsr: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, SPARC32PLUS, V8+ Required, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, stripped > > I'll take a look at that, thanks. Err, sorry - is that with the patch I posted in this thread or without?