From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] jffs2/jfs/xfs: switch over to 'check_acl' rather than 'permission()' Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:34:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20090908183431.GA22314@infradead.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Al Viro , Linux Filesystem Mailing List , Eric Paris , Mimi Zohar , James Morris To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org The split of these patches is a bit odd, either do all in one patch or one patch per filesystem instead of those groups. That beeing said if we go down this way I would prefer if we go down all the way, that is convert the remaining few filesystems that pass a check_acl argument to generic_permission (btrfs, gfs2, ocfs2) and just kill off that argument. After that there is another step we can easily go: as we now cache the ACLs in the generic inode instead of the per-fs one we can move the get_cached_acl call to your acl_permission_check helper (for gfs2/ocfs2 that don't cache ACLs it will always fail), and not call out to the fs for the fast path at all.