From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] writeback: use 64MB MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:29:38 -0400
Message-ID: <20090909232938.GD24951@mit.edu>
References: <20090909145141.293229693@intel.com> <20090909150600.874037375@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, jack@suse.cz,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:51868 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752810AbZIIXaD (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 9 Sep 2009 19:30:03 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090909150600.874037375@intel.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:51:46PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> + * The maximum number of pages to writeout in a single periodic/background
> + * writeback operation. 64MB means I_SYNC may be hold for up to 1 second.
> + * This is not a big problem since we normally do kind of trylock on I_SYNC
> + * for non-data-integrity writes.  Userspace tasks doing throttled writeback
> + * do not use this value.

What's your justification for using 64MB?  Where are you getting 1
second from?  On a fast RAID array 64MB can be written in much less
than 1 second.

More generally, I assume your patches conflict with Jens' per-bdi patches?

     		  	      	      	       - Ted