From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"jack@suse.cz" <jack@suse.cz>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/7] writeback: use 64MB MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:35:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910073553.GA21899@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252558398.7205.0.camel@laptop>
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:53:18PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 19:29 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:51:46PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > + * The maximum number of pages to writeout in a single periodic/background
> > > + * writeback operation. 64MB means I_SYNC may be hold for up to 1 second.
> > > + * This is not a big problem since we normally do kind of trylock on I_SYNC
> > > + * for non-data-integrity writes. Userspace tasks doing throttled writeback
> > > + * do not use this value.
> >
> > What's your justification for using 64MB? Where are you getting 1
> > second from? On a fast RAID array 64MB can be written in much less
> > than 1 second.
>
> Worse, on my 5mb/s usb stick writing out 64m will take forever.
cp bigfile1 bigfile2 /mnt/usb/
sync
In that case the user would notice that kernel keeps writing to one
file for up to 13 seconds before switching to another file.
A simple fix would look like this. It stops io continuation on one
file after 1 second. It will work because when io is congested, it
relies on the io continuation logic (based on last_file*) to retry
the same file until MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES is reached. The queue-able
requests between congested <=> uncongested states are not very large.
For slow devices, the queue-able pages between empty <=> congested
states are also not very large. For example, my USB stick has
nr_requests=128 and max_sectors_kb=120. It would take less than 12MB
to congest this queue.
With this patch and my usb stick, the kernel may first sync 12MB for
bigfile1 (which takes 1-3 seconds), then sync bigfile2 for 1 second,
and then bigfile1 for 1 second, and so on.
It seems that we could now safely bump MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES to even
larger values beyond 128MB :)
Thanks,
Fengguang
---
--- linux.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-10 15:02:48.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-10 15:07:23.000000000 +0800
@@ -277,7 +277,8 @@ static void requeue_io(struct inode *ino
*/
static void requeue_partial_io(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct inode *inode)
{
- if (wbc->last_file_written == 0 ||
+ if (time_before(wbc->last_file_time + HZ, jiffies) ||
+ wbc->last_file_written == 0 ||
wbc->last_file_written >= MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES)
return requeue_io(inode);
@@ -428,6 +429,7 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
if (wbc->last_file != inode->i_ino) {
wbc->last_file = inode->i_ino;
+ wbc->last_file_time = jiffies;
wbc->last_file_written = nr_to_write - wbc->nr_to_write;
} else
wbc->last_file_written += nr_to_write - wbc->nr_to_write;
--- linux.orig/include/linux/writeback.h 2009-09-10 15:07:28.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/include/linux/writeback.h 2009-09-10 15:08:46.000000000 +0800
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct writeback_control {
long nr_to_write; /* Write this many pages, and decrement
this for each page written */
unsigned long last_file; /* Inode number of last written file */
+ unsigned long last_file_time; /* First sync time for last file */
long last_file_written; /* Total pages written for last file */
long pages_skipped; /* Pages which were not written */
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20090909145141.293229693@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20090909150601.159061863@intel.com>
2009-09-09 15:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] writeback: balance_dirty_pages() shall write more than dirtied pages Jan Kara
2009-09-10 1:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 12:57 ` Chris Mason
2009-09-10 13:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 15:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 15:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 16:08 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <20090909150600.330539880@intel.com>
2009-09-09 15:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] writeback: cleanup writeback_single_inode() Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20090909150600.451373732@intel.com>
2009-09-09 15:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] writeback: fix queue_io() ordering Jan Kara
2009-09-10 1:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 14:14 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-10 14:17 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <20090909150600.874037375@intel.com>
2009-09-09 23:29 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] writeback: use 64MB MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES Theodore Tso
2009-09-10 0:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-09-10 4:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-10 7:35 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090910073553.GA21899@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).