From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
chris.mason@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org, tytso@mit.edu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jack@suse.cz,
trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] fs: remove bdev->bd_inode_backing_dev_info
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:06:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916120623.GA26030@duck.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253038617-30204-2-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>
On Tue 15-09-09 20:16:47, Jens Axboe wrote:
> It has been unused since it was introduced in:
>
> commit 520808bf20e90fdbdb320264ba7dd5cf9d47dcac
> Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
> Date: Fri May 21 00:46:17 2004 -0700
>
> [PATCH] block device layer: separate backing_dev_info infrastructure
>
> So lets just kill it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Fine with me: Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/block_dev.c | 1 -
> fs/inode.c | 4 +---
> fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c | 4 +---
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 -
> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> index 3581a4e..71e7e03 100644
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -420,7 +420,6 @@ static void bdev_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
> {
> struct bdev_inode *bdi = BDEV_I(inode);
>
> - bdi->bdev.bd_inode_backing_dev_info = NULL;
> kmem_cache_free(bdev_cachep, bdi);
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
> index ae7b67e..b2ba83d 100644
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -182,9 +182,7 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode)
> if (sb->s_bdev) {
> struct backing_dev_info *bdi;
>
> - bdi = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode_backing_dev_info;
> - if (!bdi)
> - bdi = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info;
> + bdi = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info;
> mapping->backing_dev_info = bdi;
> }
> inode->i_private = NULL;
> diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
> index d4168e2..ad391a8 100644
> --- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
> @@ -591,9 +591,7 @@ int init_nilfs(struct the_nilfs *nilfs, struct nilfs_sb_info *sbi, char *data)
>
> nilfs->ns_mount_state = le16_to_cpu(sbp->s_state);
>
> - bdi = nilfs->ns_bdev->bd_inode_backing_dev_info;
> - if (!bdi)
> - bdi = nilfs->ns_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info;
> + bdi = nilfs->ns_bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info;
> nilfs->ns_bdi = bdi ? : &default_backing_dev_info;
>
> /* Finding last segment */
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index b21cf6b..db29588 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -655,7 +655,6 @@ struct block_device {
> int bd_invalidated;
> struct gendisk * bd_disk;
> struct list_head bd_list;
> - struct backing_dev_info *bd_inode_backing_dev_info;
> /*
> * Private data. You must have bd_claim'ed the block_device
> * to use this. NOTE: bd_claim allows an owner to claim
> --
> 1.6.4.1.207.g68ea
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-15 18:16 [PATCH 0/11] Post merge per-bdi writeback patches v3 Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs: remove bdev->bd_inode_backing_dev_info Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:06 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 02/11] writeback: get rid of wbc->for_writepages Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:07 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 03/11] writeback: merely wakeup flusher thread if work allocation fails for WB_SYNC_NONE Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:08 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 04/11] writeback: make wb_writeback() take an argument structure Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:53 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:06 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 05/11] Assign bdi in super_block Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:16 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:00 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 06/11] writeback: only use bdi_writeback_all() for WB_SYNC_NONE writeout Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: use RCU to protect bdi_list Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 08/11] writeback: inline allocation failure handling in bdi_alloc_queue_work() Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 09/11] writeback: separate starting of sync vs opportunistic writeback Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:05 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:07 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 10/11] writeback: splice dirty inode entries to default bdi on bdi_destroy() Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:12 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:21 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:29 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-17 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 11/11] writeback: add comments to bdi_work structure Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:15 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090916120623.GA26030@duck.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).