linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	chris.mason@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] writeback: separate starting of sync vs opportunistic writeback
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:07:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916130705.GO23126@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090916130506.GF26030@duck.suse.cz>

On Wed, Sep 16 2009, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 15-09-09 20:16:55, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > bdi_start_writeback() is currently split into two paths, one for
> > WB_SYNC_NONE and one for WB_SYNC_ALL. Add bdi_sync_writeback()
> > for WB_SYNC_ALL writeback and let bdi_start_writeback() handle
> > only WB_SYNC_NONE.
> > 
> > Push down the writeback_control allocation and only accept the
> > parameters that make sense for each function. This cleans up
> > the API considerably.
>   Nice cleanup!
> 
> > @@ -771,6 +798,8 @@ static long wb_check_old_data_flush(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> >  		struct wb_writeback_args args = {
> >  			.nr_pages	= nr_pages,
> >  			.sync_mode	= WB_SYNC_NONE,
> > +			.for_kupdate	= 1,
> > +			.range_cyclic	= 1,
> >  		};
> >  
> >  		return wb_writeback(wb, &args);
>   This chunk should be in patch number 4.

Yeah, I wonder why that snuck into this one...

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-16 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-15 18:16 [PATCH 0/11] Post merge per-bdi writeback patches v3 Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs: remove bdev->bd_inode_backing_dev_info Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:06   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 02/11] writeback: get rid of wbc->for_writepages Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:07   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 03/11] writeback: merely wakeup flusher thread if work allocation fails for WB_SYNC_NONE Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:08   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 04/11] writeback: make wb_writeback() take an argument structure Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:53   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:06     ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 05/11] Assign bdi in super_block Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:16   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:00     ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 06/11] writeback: only use bdi_writeback_all() for WB_SYNC_NONE writeout Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: use RCU to protect bdi_list Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 08/11] writeback: inline allocation failure handling in bdi_alloc_queue_work() Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 09/11] writeback: separate starting of sync vs opportunistic writeback Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:05   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:07     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 10/11] writeback: splice dirty inode entries to default bdi on bdi_destroy() Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:12   ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:21     ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:29       ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 18:31         ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-17  9:33           ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 11/11] writeback: add comments to bdi_work structure Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:15   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090916130705.GO23126@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).