From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
chris.mason@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org, tytso@mit.edu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, jack@suse.cz,
trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] writeback: add comments to bdi_work structure
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:15:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916131531.GH26030@duck.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253038617-30204-12-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>
On Tue 15-09-09 20:16:57, Jens Axboe wrote:
> And document its retriever, get_next_work_item().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 3de93a9..6e199ef 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -49,15 +49,15 @@ struct wb_writeback_args {
> * Work items for the bdi_writeback threads
> */
> struct bdi_work {
> - struct list_head list;
> - struct rcu_head rcu_head;
> + struct list_head list; /* pending work list */
> + struct rcu_head rcu_head; /* for RCU free/clear of work */
>
> - unsigned long seen;
> - atomic_t pending;
> + unsigned long seen; /* threads that have seen this work */
> + atomic_t pending; /* number of threads still to do work */
>
> - struct wb_writeback_args args;
> + struct wb_writeback_args args; /* writeback arguments */
>
> - unsigned long state;
> + unsigned long state; /* flag bits, see WS_* */
> };
>
> enum {
> @@ -758,7 +758,11 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>
> /*
> * Return the next bdi_work struct that hasn't been processed by this
> - * wb thread yet
> + * wb thread yet. ->seen is initially set for each thread that exists
> + * for this device, when a thread first notices a piece of work it
> + * clears its bit. Depending on writeback type, the thread will notify
> + * completion on either receiving the work (WB_SYNC_NONE) or after
> + * it is done (WB_SYNC_ALL).
> */
> static struct bdi_work *get_next_work_item(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> struct bdi_writeback *wb)
> --
> 1.6.4.1.207.g68ea
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-15 18:16 [PATCH 0/11] Post merge per-bdi writeback patches v3 Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs: remove bdev->bd_inode_backing_dev_info Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:06 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 02/11] writeback: get rid of wbc->for_writepages Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:07 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 03/11] writeback: merely wakeup flusher thread if work allocation fails for WB_SYNC_NONE Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:08 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 04/11] writeback: make wb_writeback() take an argument structure Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:53 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:06 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 05/11] Assign bdi in super_block Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 12:16 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:00 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 06/11] writeback: only use bdi_writeback_all() for WB_SYNC_NONE writeout Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: use RCU to protect bdi_list Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 08/11] writeback: inline allocation failure handling in bdi_alloc_queue_work() Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 09/11] writeback: separate starting of sync vs opportunistic writeback Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:05 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:07 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 10/11] writeback: splice dirty inode entries to default bdi on bdi_destroy() Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:12 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 13:21 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:29 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-16 18:31 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-17 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-15 18:16 ` [PATCH 11/11] writeback: add comments to bdi_work structure Jens Axboe
2009-09-16 13:15 ` Jan Kara [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090916131531.GH26030@duck.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).