From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mszeredi@suse.cz, hch@lst.de, mark.fasheh@oracle.com,
sage@newdream.net, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
zach.brown@oracle.com
Subject: [patch 01/21] vfs: fix vfs_rename_dir for FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE filesystems
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:05:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909182005.n8IK5dJs019000@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
vfs_rename_dir() doesn't properly account for filesystems with
FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE. If new_dentry has a target inode attached, it
unhashes the new_dentry prior to the rename() iop and rehashes it after,
but doesn't account for the possibility that rename() may have swapped
{old,new}_dentry. For FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE filesystems, it rehashes
new_dentry (now the old renamed-from name, which d_move() expected to go
away), such that a subsequent lookup will find it.
This was caught by the recently posted POSIX fstest suite, rename/10.t
test 62 (and others) on ceph.
The bug was introduced by: commit 349457ccf2592c14bdf13b6706170ae2e94931b1
"[PATCH] Allow file systems to manually d_move() inside of ->rename()"
Fix by not rehashing the new dentry. Rehashing used to be needed by
d_move() but isn't anymore.
Reported-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/namei.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/namei.c~vfs-fix-vfs_rename_dir-for-fs_rename_does_d_move-filesystems fs/namei.c
--- a/fs/namei.c~vfs-fix-vfs_rename_dir-for-fs_rename_does_d_move-filesystems
+++ a/fs/namei.c
@@ -2741,8 +2741,6 @@ static int vfs_rename_dir(struct inode *
if (!error)
target->i_flags |= S_DEAD;
mutex_unlock(&target->i_mutex);
- if (d_unhashed(new_dentry))
- d_rehash(new_dentry);
dput(new_dentry);
}
if (!error)
_
reply other threads:[~2009-09-18 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909182005.n8IK5dJs019000@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=mszeredi@suse.cz \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).