From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [patch 20/21] vfs: no "(unreachable)" prefix for SYSVIPC maps in /proc/PID/maps Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:07:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20090921100748.GC14381@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <200909182006.n8IK62Db019767@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20090921100451.GJ5858@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mszeredi@suse.cz, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, agruen@suse.de, hch@lst.de, hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk, matthew@wil.cx To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:33810 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755842AbZIUKHp (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 06:07:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090921100451.GJ5858@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:04:51AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > I'd rather see 17, 19 and 20 collapsed... D'oh - s/17/16/ in the above. IOW, d_path() patch + these two fixups to it.