From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, npiggin@suse.de,
tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] ext4: Convert filesystem to the new truncate calling convention
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:37:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090922173704.GB31447@duck.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090922172347.GG14381@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Tue 22-09-09 18:23:47, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 07:16:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > No. We already have one half-finished series here; mixing it with another
> > > one is not going to happen. Such flags are tolerable only as bisectability
> > > helpers. They *must* disappear by the end of series. Before it can be
> > > submitted for merge.
> > >
> > > In effect, you are mixing truncate switchover with your writepage one.
> > > Please, split and reorder.
>
> > Well, this wasn't meant as a final version of those patches. It was
> > meant as a request for comment whether it makes sence to fix the problem
> > how I propose to fix it. If we agree on that, I'll go and convert the rest
> > of filesystems so that we can remove .new_writepage hack. By that time I
> > hope that new truncate sequence patches will be merged so that dependency
> > should go away as well...
>
> Could you carve just the ext4 part of truncate series out of that and
> post it separately?
Definitely. Actually, I've sent that patch to Nick in private but you're
right I should have posted it to the list as well. Will do it in a moment.
Thanks for a reminder.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-22 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-17 15:21 [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Improve VFS to handle better mmaps when blocksize < pagesize (v3) Jan Kara
2009-09-17 15:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] fs: buffer_head writepage no invalidate Jan Kara
2009-09-17 15:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs: Remove zeroing from nobh_writepage Jan Kara
2009-09-17 15:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] ext4: Deprecate nobh mount option Jan Kara
2009-09-17 15:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] vfs: Add better VFS support for page_mkwrite when blocksize < pagesize Jan Kara
2009-09-17 15:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] ext4: Convert filesystem to the new truncate calling convention Jan Kara
2009-09-22 14:36 ` Al Viro
2009-09-22 17:16 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-22 17:23 ` Al Viro
2009-09-22 17:37 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2009-09-17 15:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] ext4: Convert ext4 to new mkwrite code Jan Kara
2009-09-17 15:21 ` [PATCH 7/7] ext2: Convert ext2 " Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090922173704.GB31447@duck.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).