From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: "jens.axboe@oracle.com" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: introduce writeback wait queue
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 11:05:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091004030504.GA20644@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091004030153.GA20327@localhost>
Hi Jens,
This is a bug fix for 2.6.32. Maybe other not block-queue based
filesystems will have similar issues ..
Thanks,
Fengguang
On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 11:01:53AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> The generic writeback routines are departing from congestion_wait()
> in preference of get_request_wait(), aka. to wait on the block queues.
>
> Introduce the missing writeback wait queue for NFS, otherwise its
> writeback pages will grow out of control.
>
> The SYNC writes can use the full queue space (2*nfs_congestion_kb), while
> the ASYNC writes can only use half queue space. This way SYNC writes won't
> be blocked by the ASYNC ones at all.
>
> We'll be waiting inside the NFS_INO_FLUSHING lock, hence also be
> blocking possible dirtiers. This should not be a bit problem.
> And we should be able to obsolete the NFS_INO_FLUSHING with more
> general writeback improvements in long term.
>
> CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/client.c | 2
> fs/nfs/write.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 1
> 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux.orig/fs/nfs/write.c 2009-10-04 08:47:16.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/fs/nfs/write.c 2009-10-04 10:55:32.000000000 +0800
> @@ -189,24 +189,58 @@ static int wb_priority(struct writeback_
>
> int nfs_congestion_kb;
>
> +/*
> + * SYNC requests will be blocked on NFS_SYNC_*_THRESH
> + * ASYNC requests will be blocked on NFS_CONGESTION_*_THRESH
> + */
> +#define NFS_SYNC_WAIT_THRESH (nfs_congestion_kb >> (PAGE_SHIFT-11))
> +#define NFS_SYNC_WAKEUP_THRESH \
> + (NFS_SYNC_WAIT_THRESH - (NFS_SYNC_WAIT_THRESH >> 2))
> +
> #define NFS_CONGESTION_ON_THRESH (nfs_congestion_kb >> (PAGE_SHIFT-10))
> #define NFS_CONGESTION_OFF_THRESH \
> (NFS_CONGESTION_ON_THRESH - (NFS_CONGESTION_ON_THRESH >> 2))
>
> -static int nfs_set_page_writeback(struct page *page)
> +static void nfs_writeback_wait(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> {
> - int ret = test_set_page_writeback(page);
> + struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> + struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode);
> + int is_sync = wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE;
> + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>
> - if (!ret) {
> - struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> - struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode);
> + if (atomic_long_inc_return(&nfss->writeback) < NFS_CONGESTION_ON_THRESH)
> + return;
>
> - if (atomic_long_inc_return(&nfss->writeback) >
> - NFS_CONGESTION_ON_THRESH) {
> - set_bdi_congested(&nfss->backing_dev_info,
> - BLK_RW_ASYNC);
> - }
> + set_bdi_congested(&nfss->backing_dev_info, BLK_RW_ASYNC);
> +
> + if (is_sync && atomic_long_read(&nfss->writeback) <
> + NFS_SYNC_WAIT_THRESH)
> + return;
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&nfss->writeback_wait[is_sync], &wait,
> + TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> +
> + io_schedule();
> +
> + finish_wait(&nfss->writeback_wait[is_sync], &wait);
> +
> + if (atomic_long_read(&nfss->writeback) <
> + NFS_CONGESTION_OFF_THRESH)
> + break;
> + if (is_sync && atomic_long_read(&nfss->writeback) <
> + NFS_SYNC_WAKEUP_THRESH)
> + break;
> }
> +}
> +
> +static int nfs_set_page_writeback(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +{
> + int ret = test_set_page_writeback(page);
> +
> + if (!ret)
> + nfs_writeback_wait(page, wbc);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -216,8 +250,18 @@ static void nfs_end_page_writeback(struc
> struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(inode);
>
> end_page_writeback(page);
> - if (atomic_long_dec_return(&nfss->writeback) < NFS_CONGESTION_OFF_THRESH)
> - clear_bdi_congested(&nfss->backing_dev_info, BLK_RW_ASYNC);
> +
> + if (atomic_long_dec_return(&nfss->writeback) < NFS_SYNC_WAKEUP_THRESH) {
> + if (waitqueue_active(&nfss->writeback_wait[1]))
> + wake_up(&nfss->writeback_wait[1]);
> + if (atomic_long_read(&nfss->writeback) <
> + NFS_CONGESTION_OFF_THRESH) {
> + clear_bdi_congested(&nfss->backing_dev_info, BLK_RW_ASYNC);
> + if (waitqueue_active(&nfss->writeback_wait[0]))
> + wake_up(&nfss->writeback_wait[0]);
> + }
> + }
> +
> }
>
> static struct nfs_page *nfs_find_and_lock_request(struct page *page)
> @@ -254,6 +298,7 @@ static struct nfs_page *nfs_find_and_loc
> * May return an error if the user signalled nfs_wait_on_request().
> */
> static int nfs_page_async_flush(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio,
> + struct writeback_control *wbc,
> struct page *page)
> {
> struct nfs_page *req;
> @@ -266,7 +311,7 @@ static int nfs_page_async_flush(struct n
> if (IS_ERR(req))
> goto out;
>
> - ret = nfs_set_page_writeback(page);
> + ret = nfs_set_page_writeback(page, wbc);
> BUG_ON(ret != 0);
> BUG_ON(test_bit(PG_CLEAN, &req->wb_flags));
>
> @@ -286,7 +331,7 @@ static int nfs_do_writepage(struct page
> nfs_add_stats(inode, NFSIOS_WRITEPAGES, 1);
>
> nfs_pageio_cond_complete(pgio, page->index);
> - return nfs_page_async_flush(pgio, page);
> + return nfs_page_async_flush(pgio, wbc, page);
> }
>
> /*
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h 2009-10-04 09:31:25.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h 2009-10-04 09:58:11.000000000 +0800
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ struct nfs_server {
> struct nfs_iostats * io_stats; /* I/O statistics */
> struct backing_dev_info backing_dev_info;
> atomic_long_t writeback; /* number of writeback pages */
> + wait_queue_head_t writeback_wait[2];
> int flags; /* various flags */
> unsigned int caps; /* server capabilities */
> unsigned int rsize; /* read size */
> --- linux.orig/fs/nfs/client.c 2009-10-04 09:59:46.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/fs/nfs/client.c 2009-10-04 10:00:55.000000000 +0800
> @@ -991,6 +991,8 @@ static struct nfs_server *nfs_alloc_serv
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&server->master_link);
>
> atomic_set(&server->active, 0);
> + init_waitqueue_head(&server->writeback_wait[BLK_RW_SYNC]);
> + init_waitqueue_head(&server->writeback_wait[BLK_RW_ASYNC]);
>
> server->io_stats = nfs_alloc_iostats();
> if (!server->io_stats) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-04 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-04 3:01 [PATCH] NFS: introduce writeback wait queue Wu Fengguang
2009-10-04 3:05 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2009-10-05 11:00 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20091005110010.GW26573-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-06 0:12 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-10-05 7:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Wu Fengguang
2009-10-05 7:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-10-05 7:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-10-05 10:55 ` Myklebust, Trond
[not found] ` <F047DA72-75B3-4447-84EB-7115C77ECBA3-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-05 13:08 ` Wu Fengguang
2009-10-05 11:01 ` Myklebust, Trond
[not found] ` <86DD3A52-EE5C-4378-BEB6-6336E17CFCD5-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-05 13:51 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091004030504.GA20644@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).